mai 12, 2025
Home » Why the video evidence in football often leads to questionable decisions

Why the video evidence in football often leads to questionable decisions

Why the video evidence in football often leads to questionable decisions

The touch through the technology leaves a flaw, a sign, an impression. Due to the introduction of the video assistant, the once so pure game has lost its innocence. Is of course nonsense. Football has never been a pastime naive. Since the first kick -off, the 22 actors on the lawn have tried to secure advantages in all conceivable way. Swallows, handballs, hidden fouls – the range of misconduct is wide. The players are supported by coaches who partly affirmatively favor the breakdown (« Mach et otze »)and fans who want to loudly influence the senses of the referee. This melange of unfair expressions of interest also make a football game an emotional experience.

When one once decided to reduce the number of wrong decisions with the help of technical aids, those responsible did not have in mind to prevent ecstatic outbursts of emotion. The purity of the game should be promoted much more. A permanently continuous wash. The game not only became cleaner, but also sterile. Diatromy assaults away from the game have noticeably subsided. The danger of becoming a video is too great. With every goal celebration, there is a risk that the endorphins will be illuminated by the Cologne cellar.

FC Augsburg is understandably upset

Finally, it was therefore agreed to take the referees in the field again. The video assistant’s intervention really only with clear wrong decisions. Markus Schmidt seems to be a very cult of man. The acceptance of the Trojan horse? Not necessarily wrong. So at least from the point of view of the Trojans. FC Augsburg was unlucky that Schmidt was divided into Hoffenheim as a video referee for the game and saw no starting point to collect the penalty imposed by Tobias Reichel. Augsburg’s Jeffrey Gouweleeuw had received the ball by chance by a short distancethat Reichel’s decision should have been revised. However, the congratant Mr. Schmidt allowed the Hoffenheimers to astonish all the gift. What is very annoying for the Augsburgers for understandable reasons and the intention of making the game fair.

Without the human flaw, the game would be much poorer. You can certainly see that differently in Augsburg.



View Original Source