mai 10, 2025
Home » Who takes the election through the institutions?

Who takes the election through the institutions?

Who takes the election through the institutions?


The prosecutor's office is at the top of the institutional bacchanalia, which is played along the re -counting of votes from the election. What the purpose of this brutal intervention may be, commented Veselin Stoynev in Deutsche Welle Analysiswhich « diary » publishes.
If the elections have been defective by the parties so far, the institutions on which their legality depends. The finale of the recalculation of the results of the last parliamentary elections proved to be blocked by the Constitutional Court (CC), the Central Election Commission (CEC), Information Services and the Sofia City Prosecutor's Office (Sofia City Court). Any of these institutions, probably in this ascending line, made its contribution Citizens' trust in election to be finally collapsedS

Since the Constitutional Court acted in the event of complete opacity and banned the CEC from announcing the data from the closed check, for the first time in its history, the chairman made him a national television, and the next day he also interviewed National Radio. Pavlina Panova announced that the court was sabotaged somewhere in the above institutional chain and could not rule on the vote to which he was the only one.

The CEC asks for every thing the KS and does not assume any responsibility, and finally transferred the ball to « Information Services » that it has handed it all the protocols of the inspection of the experts to the Constitutional Court to recalculate the vote. The state -owned company, on the other hand, reports to the prosecutor's office and first they say that they have handed her all the materials, and the next morning – that they are not.

Prosecutor's Office – on top of Bacchanalia

Prosecutors' intervention is the most striking action in this institutional bacchanalia. KS Chairman Pavlina Panova said it was not the job of « Information Services » to bring the prosecutor's office, nor the prosecutor's office could ask for anything from the Constitutional Court until he ruled in the case. A human rights defenders spoke of a coup on the prosecution and scheduled civil protestsS It turned out that the prosecutor's office, by her own letter, had asked the Constitutional Court of the Constitutional Case, including which judges and experts had determined which election papers to be submitted in the preparation of the assessment. Unprecedented: The prosecutor's office is trying to investigate the Constitutional Court itself.
In fact, the scheme for brutal institutional intervention has already been worked. Prosecutor's Office – Information Services in the 2023 local elections was in the form of DANS – CEC, When the machine voting was canceled two days before the vote And restored by the Supreme Administrative Court for the second round, when it was no longer needed. Neither then, nor in the subsequent parliamentary elections, the SANS and the prosecutor's office adequately intervened against the purchase of votes, and the state prosecution remained passively for the videos of the election sections for falsification of the vote.

What can be the purpose of brutal intervention?

First, to influence the election barrier – it may be such that « Greatness » does not enter the parliamentalthough they did not reach a handful of votes, and from CCTV in some sections it has been proven to be damaged. However, experts hired by the CEC for re -counting, however, announced publicly that there were also inscribed for «  »Greatness« Voices. But in the case of distrust in the revision of the vote, the truth, whatever it is, will remain doubtful.

Secondly, it may be influenced by the displacement of MPs – in one parliamentary group one may need to replace another, which is not profitable.

Fourth, you can simply delay the already protected partial revision of the vote, and this is advantageous when the ruling majority is shaking inside. At the very least, there is a budget and a fragile parliamentary majority of 126 people can melt the critical 121 if the Ninth Parliamentary Group enters the National Assembly.

Fifth, one can look for a way for a quick election. To suggest that this parliament is completely illegitimate, since the repair of the vote is manipulated. And with an emergency new vote, with even more election disgusted citizens who will stay home, and with the same voting rules, a new party start can come out even ahead.

Sixth, maybe the confidence in the election process and its reporting can stop any desire for new elections. As the re -counting is corrupt, it will be difficult to rely on both civil and party energy – whether among the opposition or among the ruling, for a request for early parliamentary elections in the near future. And stabilize the fragile status quo.

Seventh, this may be just a demonstration that there is no brake in front of the prosecutor's bat, it can « dust » and the Constitutional Court, so that anyone in whatever high post is, firmly « pressure rags ».

Can there be a positive effect on the defect?

The unprecedented action against the foundations of democracy – the election, however, can also be a very good incentive for decisive action against the backstage that has mastered key state institutions. As the President stated Radev: « The bet is no longer only the honesty of the election, but our functioning as a democracy. The pledge is whether the behind -the -scenes will absorb the whole country or find the strength to reject it. »
Now is the time to consolidate political will in parliament, the president, and civil society in several sanitary key steps.
First, this civil-political will to demonstrate support and pressure to quickly and fairly resolve the pending constitutional election work. Second, to achieve a broad -parliamentary understanding of a transparent election of independent members of the Supreme Judicial Council, Ombudsman and regulatorsS Third, to change the Electoral Code with the introduction of census centers and evidence valid CCTV in sections.

It is high time this time the thunder hits the echo not to fade.

The « Analysis » section presents different perspectives, it is not necessarily the expressed opinions that they coincide with the editorial position of Dnevnik.



View Original Source