mai 11, 2025
Home » Who are the « terrorists » because of which Russia accuses Romania

Who are the « terrorists » because of which Russia accuses Romania

Who are the « terrorists » because of which Russia accuses Romania


The « Black Sea forum: the border of the future for a safe and stable Europe », the event that took place on March 19, at the Parliament Palace, and For which Moscow accuses Romania of interference in the internal affairs of the Russian Federationwas organized by the Free Nations Forum in Post-Russia. The organization is forbidden in Russia. The Supreme Court of the Russian Federation declared this organization as a terrorist, in the autumn of 2022.

« Our main goal is: 41 independent, free, developed and successful states instead of a crazy empire”, Writes on the website of the forum. « Decolonization of the so-called Russian federation. What we do is the struggle of anti -economic and national liberation against the imperialism of the Moscow Kremlin. The terrorist empire of the Russian Federation must be replaced by a peaceful and civilized post-Russian space, by issuing the occupied nations and the occupied regions. There is no alternative to this component of new security architectures, both in Europe and worldwide. The decolonization, the liberation from the occupation and the colonial oppression of Moscow, the creation of new geopolitical entities, as well as the reconstruction that will follow the independent states of the post-Russian space: Tatarstan, Ural Republic, Saha, Bashkortostan, the United States, Karelia, Cerchezia, Ingușeia, Republic of Baltica Karaiaučius Bryatia, Pacific Federation, Nogai, Tuva, Ciuvașia, Don’s Republic, Tyumen-Yugra Federation, Komî, Republic of Tver, Altai, Kuban, Volga Federation, Byarmia, Iriston, Republic of Novgorod, Smalandia, Federation Zalesye Federation, Hakasia, Republic Kumîkia, Koland, Republic of Chernozemia and others« , Is noted on the website of the forum.

The free native forum in Post-Russia is a forum created in Poland, immediately after the Russian invasion in Ukraine, when The Atlantic or the Commission for Security and Cooperation in Europe of the Biden-clinton-UNIV invited to discussions that a defeat of Putin in Ukraine would lead to the split of the Russian Federation.

Now, after three years, Moscow is going to win the war, and the US government negotiates with the Russian Federation the cessation of the Ukraine, and the same US government dismantles the US-state-owned organizations, starting with Usid, who put their shoulder to the creation of organizations such as the Post-Rusia Freed Fire. Whether it was a well thought out or not, inviting this forum to Bucharest, in the middle of American negotiations with Russia, will be interpreted as a message from the Romanian state. In Moscow, this message led to « Sending the materials collected to the General Prosecutor’s Office of the Russian Federation for a legal evaluation and decision making in accordance with our political and diplomatic actions », as the State Duma Commission, quoted by TASS shows. It remains to be seen if the reaction of Washington will be as public.

Events such as the one in Bucharest should not make anyone lament Russia, the one who has chipped territorially and Romania. But it should generate some questions about how appropriate it is for Bucharest to put the beat in the fence of Russia when Moscow negotiates with Washington and there is a break between Western Europe and United States. The Free Nations Forum in Post-Russia has had events in Paris, London, Brussels, Rome, even in Washington, hosted by Jamestown Foundation in Paris, London, London, Brussels. Now, the host is the Parliament Palace. It can be a signal that Romania has chosen to be in « NATO European », rather than in « NATO American », the United States negotiating with Russia.

« The great danger is not that Vladimir Putin will try to create a kind of third Reich. The danger is a nuclear war started from a dispute for the control of some beaches from the Black Sea, » wrote the Historian Sumantra Maitra, for The American Conservative. « No one should test the hypothesis that Putin will resort to the nuclear weapon, if it is so, and the US must convey discreetly to European allies that they will not jump to their aid, if their lack of caution will lead to a paranoid response of Russia. Putin is already facing challenges in the far -right area. »

The ideas of the split of the Russian Federation echoed, at the time of the free nations forum in Post-Russia, and Kaja Kallas, the prime minister of Estonia, who also talked about the need for the potential « post-immperor Russia » to rewrite the history manuals, so that the new Russians would not be tempted by the resumption. Now, Kaja Kallas is the head of EU diplomacy.

In May 2022, The Atlantic published an article entitled « Discolishment of Russia ». « In order to avoid meaningless blood, the Kremlin must lose the empire it still holds, » wrote The Atlantic. At the same time, the Committee on Security and Cooperation in Europe of the US government has published an announcement about an online briefing entitled « Russia’s decolonization – a moral and strategic imperative. » In the invitation to the event it was written: « Russia’s barbarian war in Ukraine-and before in Syria, Libya, Georgia and Chechnya-exposed throughout the world the vicious and imperial character of the Russian Federation. Its aggression has catalyzed a debate on the internal empire of Russia, considering that Moscow dominates many indigenous nations and the fact that Kremlin and Kremlin Their national self-determination is now serious and controversial discussions about the approach of Russia’s fundamental imperialism and the need to « discolon » Russia, and then become a viable partner for the security and stability of Europe. Attentive to his imperialist tendencies, often brutal. « 

The Free Nations Forum in Post-Russia appeared on this background of the US organizations offensive to the Biden-Clinton-Unand administration, with support from the National Endowment for Democracy or directly from the Government.

What happened in Bucharest now, in 2023, took place in Paris and London. There, the aforementioned forum organized several events, with activists for independence from the North Caucasus, from the Turkish Republics of the Russian Federation, from the Republics with Balto-Finic Communities in the north of the Russian Federation, from the Republics of Buddhist communities in Siberia. They all have plans for what they call post-immperient Russia. They would all have plans for « post-immperient Russia ».

« The great danger is not that Vladimir Putin will try to create a kind of third Reich. The danger is a nuclear war started from a dispute for the control of some beaches from the Black Sea. »

« The Russian Empire, the Soviet Empire, Putin’s Empire – all are a terrible evil and must be dismantled, so that no one is attacking, » said a participant in the forum, former journalist on Eko Movskii radio in St. Petersnburg, now immigrant in the West. All members of the forum have left Russia. « Russia is an aggressor and terrorist state. It is the last European empire in a time when there are no empires, » the Russian said, in 2023. The Russian journalist who left his country after the invasion in Ukraine offers three scenarios for the republics who will want independence. The first is optimistic – peaceful separation, once the Moscow authority disappears. The second scenario is a warrior – a triumphant march on the Kremlin of Ukrainian forces and volunteers in the Russian Federation. The third scenario is the favorite of the Russian journalist – the total occupation of Russia by NATO forces, as it happened with Germany or Japan after the World War; It would arrive here after Vladimir Putin used the nuclear weapon, and Vestu to win the war that would immediately follow Russia.

The Russian federation consists of 89 regions, to which the regions of Ukraine can be added. There are 22 ethnic republics who have an autonomous status, with their own Constitution, language and Parliament. Only one republic fought for independence – Chechnya – and this resulted in two bloody wars, the latter contributing to the legitimation of the Putin regime.

Beyond the desires of the separatists who left the Russian Federation, in the war in Ukraine participates in the extremely few citizens from the mentioned republics. There is no lowest indication that a majority of the inhabitants of these republics would like independence. The economic viability of these republics is not clear – they are rich in natural resources, but they do not have a large exit and depend on the transport infrastructure of Moscow.

Vladimir Milov, former Russian Minister of Energy, who also went to the West, criticizes the activity of the Free Nations Forum and says that « disintegrationists » seem to be broken by reality, promote dangerous plans and get to be used for the benefit of the Kremlin propaganda. « This debate is speculated by Putin and its propagandists. It is easier to say that Russia aggression in Ukraine is a defensive action against Western attempts to destroy Russia, » says Milov.

The members of the forum say, however, that their disintegration plans of the Russian Federation will be successful. In the 1930s, no one thought that the British Empire would disintegrate, says Russian journalist of St. Petersburg. And Edward Lucas, a former correspondent of The Economist magazine, shows that, in the years preceding the disolving USSR and the independence of the Baltic states, the pro-independence in these former three Soviet republics were not taken seriously. « But they were the ones who laughed at the end, » says Lucas.

At the event of the « Black Sea forum: the border of the future for a safe and stable Europe » participated representatives of Jamestown Foundation, including Janusz Bugajski, who claimed, just before the opening of the forum, that « Europe must prepare for an imminent collapse of the Russian Federation. Energy, with the exhaustion of financial reserves, the excessive dependence on a high cost economy for the civil sector, with the decrease of the standard of living and with the perspective of social disorders.

For Romanians, Jamestown Foundation means first and foremost Vladimir Socor, who went to the US in the 1970s, then reached Radio Free Europe in Munich and then known as an analyst of the post-Soviet space. Jamestown Foundation was created with the help of the US government in the 1980s, with the aim of supporting and promoting Soviet spies and the socialist camp that deserted, including Ion Mihai Pacepa, who published his bestsellers with the help of the Foundation. In the leadership of Jamestown, Zbigniew Brzezinski also found. Now, the Think-Tank is led by former American officials, including former CIA director Michael Hayden.



View Original Source