We can do Rijeka! He rolled through Filipovic: ‘This is not the development of the city, it is a favor to the investor!’
We can do Rijeka! He responded to the statement of Mayor Marko Filipovic on the rejection of the City Council to vote to change the spatial plan and the GUP, saying that the development of the city is not based on agreement with one investor and that what Filipovic calls for development, in fact it is a favor.
From we can! On Monday, they state that Filipovic transferred the burden of his reluctance to city councilors in a heartbreaking statement, and that it seems that most of all the pain of the impossibility of fulfilling the promise he has made to investors in non -transparent arrangements.
The Rijeka City Council did not accept the proposals for the development of the spatial and general urban plan of Rijeka last week because the councilors voted with one vote for, four votes against and 24 restrained. The proposals found themselves in front of the councilors for the third time, after Filipovic had twice withdrew them from the agenda.
Filipovic today announced that rejection of amendments aggravates and slow down the implementation of numerous important projects and that « it is difficult not to notice that the decision was made in the election atmosphere, where political calculations take advantage of citizens’ interests. »
Rijeka: SDP’s Marko Filipovic with party colleagues follows the state of exit polls |
From we can! They stated that they were responding because in a statement, Filipovic called councilors who voted for restrained or against, and thus, we can do councilors!
They emphasize that Filipovic « suffered all the changes in the city in the city in one decision, and with one vote everything had to be accepted or dismissed. Since we were not for the conversion of the former Istravina space, because we consider it to be conducive to the investor, we can explain!, We voted against all changes.
Explaining why they are against changes to the purpose of the former Istravina space, they point out that the development of the city is not based on an agreement with one investor, but on spatial studies and urban tenders, and that, as far as housing is concerned, the development is based on the prescribing of housing zones with the construction of apartments that citizens can afford and not to build expensive apartments that will be able to sell only to the foreignmen.
They claim that the public interest is not selling for the interest of investors, as Filipovic, and that they voted against because they do not agree to the blackmail they set them up – if they want the development of Kantrida, which includes public interest and urban renewal of former Hartera, they must vote for his agreement with the investor in the Istravina zone.
They believe that if he cared about development, he would allow each area of the vote individually and that the important changes to the purpose of the former hospital in Kantrida from tourist for public purposes, as well as changes in the Hartera part, would certainly be vote, while changes in the former Istravina would remain for a new consider.
