Was he lured into a trap by his family?
Prince Harry raise severe allegations against the British establishment – and indirectly also against his own family. In two interviews, the Duke of Sussex speaks openly that his police security measures were not only withdrawn, but that this in his opinion was specifically in order to have him and Duchess Meghan To return to Great Britain to force.
Intrigue at the Royals – Has the Prince Harry royal house set a « trap »?
« My worst fears were confirmed by the judicial revelations – and that is really sad, » said Harry opposite People Magazine After a two -day hearing in London. As part of the negotiation, the By the way, Royal led out of the hall due to safety concerns become.
At the center of a long -term legal conflict is a decision by the « Royal and VIP Executive Committee » (Ravec) that determined in 2020 that Harry’s family after withdrawing from their royal duties no state -financed security protection should receive more. According to Harry, this was not only unjust, but also strategically motivated: a “trap” that should prevent the sussex from leaving the country.
For Prince Harry it is clear: the decision Him and Duchess Meghan Equipping state -financed security was not a simple administrative act – it was part of a targeted plan. In his words it was A « try to get back »who deliberately aimed to torpedo her new freedom in California.
« We were in the process of creating a happy home, » he said in retrospect in an interview with The Telegraph. But then the break came – and with it the conviction that the establishment used the security question to build up pressure. The term that Harry never pronounces directly, according to court documents, nevertheless hovers over everything: trap. Because what looked like a mere reduction in privileges met him, Meghan and their children, Archie and Lilibetat their most sensitive place: protection against dangers.
Loud People Magazine It was a realization that Harry « was difficult to digest » – and that has driven him since then.
The safety deprivation forced the sussexes into a dilemma: Without protection hardly any safe return options to the UK – almost excluded with children. The result: a life in exile. A decision that appears to the Duke in retrospect like a targeted forced position.
The suspicion: If you check the security question, you also control freedom of movement. Particularly explosive: members of the royal family are represented in Ravec – including confidants of King Charles II.. This is also why Harry believes that his father could have had more influence than he admits.
King Charles II.: What role does he play in the process of Harry’s protection?
In the current running process throws Harry the committee that he was specifically disadvantaged: pop stars and former prime minister continues to receive protection, while with his family he has to ask his family for permission to be able to enter the United Kingdom at all. And despite the high security threat due to its public profile and the past in Afghanistan.
Loud The Telegraph Harry said about the procedure: « This procedure means more than any other legal discussion. This counts here. » His conviction that his father, King Charles II.however, the palace strictly rejects: “The palace king has no influence on security decisions, ”said a spokesman for the People Magazine announced.
Prince Harry: Was he « punished » by the other Royals?
Harry has no direct contact with Charles or his brother for months William have had. The dispute over security is just another stone in the mosaic of family estrangement. Loud telegraph Harry believes that the decision on his protection in the United Kingdom was a kind of « punishment » for « putting his family in the first place ».
Many of the court hearing also took place in the exclusion of the public. The content that Harry learned there apparently shaked him deeply. « People would be shocked if they knew what was held back, » Harry told Harry Peeple. Regardless of the outcome of the process, the Duke of Sussex made it clear that it will not be given up. His motivation is not just a personal nature – he also wants to draw attention to structural grievances: « I am driven by uncovering injustice, » he said.
He is currently waiting for the judgment of the three judges, which is expected after Easter. It remains open whether something changes for him – or whether the next public step is followed, for example in the form of another book or a new documentation.
