Voice chose the shame again (comment)
When a politician does not value himself, he cannot expect it to be appreciated by voters.
Political work is, among other things, an endless test of two skills. On the one hand, it tests the ability to control concern and hit the peace on the other, as long as it is morally or politically acceptable to work with an arch -enemy, a coalition partner.
Indeed, no interaction is possible without controlling concern. Coalition partners inevitably arise serious disputes – whether they have ideological, power or purely, er, property. Then you can throw a wall and choose strong words, but then every government will spoil.
We close our way to better health protection. According to the President we unnecessarily risk the reputation of Slovakia Read
If you do not want this as an artistic politician, you either are silent, or you formulate your concern so that you do not put pressure on the consecration. However, this cannot be endlessly, two needed on the tango, and when someone approaches it as a tool for your discredit, you can temporarily maintain chairs or human or political dignity.
The voice again, again and infallibly chose the first.
The government decision to reject the pandemic treaty is an absurdity from start to end. The fact that one of the coalition partners was proclaimed would be a symptom in the normal world, if not a definite span, a serious crisis.
You understand, Direction lifts your finger, let you SNS (or voice) does not allow it to declare it in parliament with the opposition, and then declares a partner without opposition. And the voice will keep it because « it respects the majority in the government », which can only exist because it provides most of the government in parliament.
Moreover, it will keep it in the matter of its own resort, moreover, when the minister himself says that the government threatens public health. And the minister continues to sit in the government. This is cooked by the brain, it cannot, it is against political laws and logic.
And then you still Erik Tomášwho is not there for the first day, asks why the Minister of Health should withdraw when « he did everything he could, in accordance with his conscience ». Well, that’s why! « The commentator hisses with her voice and helplessly facing the table.
When the government majority does not want to protect public health in accordance with his conscience, and the parent side « respects » that partners are driving, he cannot be the Minister of Health. Is it even slower, louder or how?
This is a small political multiplier. This is not just invocation of responsibility towards citizens. Although it is a shame and a crime, for practical (cynical, if you want) politics is unacceptable especially with regard to your own interests.
Completely lapidary, when a politician does not value himself, he cannot expect voters to respect it. After all, they could already notice it in their voice.
