US President is furious, is it approaching between Russia and the US to test?

US President Donald Trump With a lenient position on Russia’s attacker, he shocked Ukraine and the European Allies. Is now honey weeks with Vladimir Putin end? The first Republican spoke about anger at the weekend, even a rage in the Russian champion, who set new conditions for a ceasefire with Ukraine, and threatened with criminal customs to Russian oil and secondary for the countries they buy.

Trump can change his position tomorrow if Putin withdraw his own, Ukraine should receive a temporary government under the United Nations supervision without the current president Volodimir of the Green. The US president himself upset the attacks on the Ukrainian leader and even drove him out of the White House, but he probably thought that he was pursuing negotiating advice from his own book on the art of making business. He hoped to tear Russia from other parts of the authoritarian alliance, which includes China, North Korea and Iran. This would change the strategic relationships in the world, according to Trump’s belief in the American benefit.

Many other analysts, however, already see the original sin, the Russian attack on Ukraine, as proof that Putin can only view democracies through a flier on a rifle tube. On the contrary, Trump has bet on hope that Putin’s Russia would not want to be a subordinate partner of China, who recognizes him himself for the greatest danger of American influence in the world and well -being. The first Republican also offers an agreement to Beijing, but also under the harsh conditions of the motto « Let’s do America again ». Chinese companies and influence have already expelled from Panama.

Trump, who sees a great deal of exploitation of the United States in the latest Pax American, also threatens allies. For this week, the announced « Independence Day » with reciprocal customs for foreign imports, and especially high cars, will also be strongly tested by them. Trump believes that allies will have to agree because they have neither replacement markets nor other security umbrella and opponents because of American power. It is also threatened by Iranian Ayatols, who are estimated to be numerous intelligence just before a nuclear bomb. In Washington, they do not exclude the imminent military showdown with Iranian nuclear programs.

Iranian religious leaders reject negotiations on nuclear programs with the US. Photo: Office of the Iranian Supreme Le Via Reuters

How many fronts can be the US president who advocates « peace through power » to return domestic well -being, but he goes to always new mines? To make promises to American workers, he is willing to risk all relations with the world. Washington’s dissatisfaction because of what they see as a European exploitation of an American security umbrella, the recent signalgate affair showed. Altantica editor Jeffrey Goldbergwho eavesdropped in conversations among the highest members of the Trump administration, revealed to the world the dissatisfaction of Vice -President JD Vancea by US rescue of the European Huti’s attacks.

The US is much less dependent on trade around the Red Sea and through the Suez Channel than Europe. Therefore, they are afraid of any new navigation routes in the Arctic if allowed to melt the ice. The Republican champions are also standing opposite Russia and China, and now it is clear that Trump Greenland is not threatening to take over just because of rare metals. Even more important is the current and future strategic role of the largest island of the world, which is poorly military insured under the Danish administration.

The Signalgate affair, allegedly mistaken by Trump’s national security advisor Mike Waltz, strives American diplomacy. Photo: Mandel Ngan/AFP

History is also instructive there. Without US engagement of Greenland, during the Second World War, the attacked European countries would not receive decisive assistance in the clash with Nazi Germany. Traditionally, it is also of utmost importance for the US, as their military base there is a potential rocket and other attacks. Europe is severely insulted and concerned by American thinking about the violent acquisitions of the territory of others, which affects the respect of the territorial integrity of sovereign countries, the foundation of its and world peace. But maybe she will realize that it can also be negotiated here for solutions that would satisfy the American wolf while preserving the Greenland goat even.

But first, the old man must judge whether he continues to need US markets and security assistance, and if the answer is positive, she will have to change a lot with himself. Both were for free until the United States agreed. Putin may still judge that the new approaching with the US is worth the rift with China, but if not, US sentences for Moscow can also indirectly affect some European countries. At least those who, according to US accusations, spend more money on Russian oil than to support Ukraine.

Russia is far ahead of all in the number of icebreakers necessary for navigation throughout the Arctic area. Photo: Sputnik Via Reuters

The current Russian-American approximation also emphasized the destructive instincts of the Russian president, which, according to many analysts, is particularly interested in influence in the neighborhood and thus in a large part of Europe. Trump, whether it is so rough, only requires equality. The potentials of new cooperation with the United States is already recognized by Finland, which is associated with Russia by border and bloody history. Chairman Alexander Stubb has offered an American colleague to assist in the acquisitions of icebreakers, which the United States has a lot of lack of.

By analyzing Trump’s motifs, Europe will have to judge whether the newly set old alliances can still ensure the security of the democratic world, even though the White House is the definition of democracy. But not just in the US. The current president is seriously talking about his third term, and what is fair elections and even freedom of speech, there is no consensus in Europe.