Tuomas Enbuske was sentenced to intimate partner violence in suspended imprisonment

Helsinki The District Court was sentenced to a journalist on Monday Tuomas Enbusken assault. He received 60 days of conditional imprisonment.

According to the judgment, Enbuske assaulted his then female friend in Helsinki in June 2019.

The assault took place in a woman's apartment. According to the judgment, Enbuske, among other things, hit the victim with a fist around the body and head, hit the threshold, spit on the face and tear his hair. In addition, he hit the victim's head on the floor and on the wall.

Woman and Enbuske's reports of the events differed significantly.

Enbuske denied the prosecution in the trial.

In his speech, he said he had behaved really bad about the woman and apologized to her.

Enbuske said that he had had a bipolar disorder during the dating relationship, which influenced his activities. He admitted that he had behaved jealously and controlfully.

However, Enbuske denied having used physical violence against the woman.

According to the defense, Enbuske did not hit the woman, but at most he liked it. Enbuske claimed that the woman hit her.

District court Evaluate the stories of both.

According to the court, the woman's report was witnessed by the woman's report on bruises and other traces, related photos, and a video recording of the woman on the day of the event.

According to the district court, the woman told about the events consistently and in detail.

“The district court considers it credible that the injuries found in the medical report were from recent use of violence. The number of bruises and their locations across the (victim) body do not indicate that (the victim) had caused them themselves or that they were born when Enbuske defends himself (the victim) from the attack on him, ”the district court states in the judgment.

According to the district court, the video recording proves Enbuske, among other things, an aggressive behavior, poured a woman in the ground, coming on top of her and spit on her face.

The district court describes the prosecutor's evidence as strong.

Its Instead, the story of Enbuske's right to keep superficial.

“Enbuske has not specifically identified the (woman's) violence against him, except for one fist -fisted beat. Enbuske has not described the events that led to the stroke or where the stroke had happened, ”the court points out.

Nor does the Enbuske report reveal how the woman's injuries were born.

In his assessment, the district court concluded that there is no suspicion of the guilt of Enbuske.

The judgment is not yet final.