Tufegcic: The indictment against Aleksandar Gjorcevski is unfounded, we are looking for release

The indictment against Aleksandar Gjorcevski is completely unfounded, unjustified, lump -sum and based on assumptions that do not support the evidence of the prosecution. The defense proved that the defendant Alexander as the father of the child Vanja is a victim and impaired in this procedure along with mother Zorica and his family and proved that he acted in a critical period in a way that every parent would act in a situation and demanded his missing child.

According to the defense, the key thesis and the theory of the case of the indictment has not been proven, and that is the motive, to give money to the defendants for the redemption of the child, nor has the father’s actions to be redeemed or proving his communication with his communication.

– Alexander because of the brutal murder of his child and the difficult consequences for him and his family, this court does not require mercy or decision for pity and empathy towards him, Alexander is seeking a righteous court ruling that will punish the perpetrators, a court decision to find out about the monster and the right to do so for this Pain – said Tufegcic.

The prosecution’s approach, according to Tufegcic, is an unauthorized and dangerous precedent which means accusation of assumed, not proven guilt, an assertion that is completely unfounded and lump sum because the phones used by the father are criminally expert and no proof of communication or deleted records.

-From the statements of witnesses Zorica Gjorcevska, Ivanka Gjorcevska, Zoran Gjorcevski, Oli Neskovic and Ivo Neskovic proves that Alexander, although divorced, was extremely related, responsible and dedicated to their children and had a high degree of care for them on a daily basis. These witnesses gave a clear description of the events in the critical period, from November 27, 2023 to the day of finding the deceased child, in which events along with the father Alexander and their own and their statements were no different from the description of the events and actions described by their father and their father. In the part that persons and what actions have taken to find the missing child Vanja, the behavior of the police and the reasons for the distrust of the police due to the way they have been treated – said Tufegcic.

The prosecution, according to him, tried to discredit the father’s personality with provocative and offensive questions during the proceedings to prove that Alexander’s father had a motive to participate in the kidnapping of his own child because according to the prosecution’s thesis, he was a non -worker, a drug addict, The procedure from his ex -wife Zorica and other witnesses speak just the opposite.

– The high degree of suspicion against the father as a key factor was to be accused of being the only thing he claimed that the child was kidnapped. The defense with material evidence has proven that such a thesis is completely wrong and inaccurate – Tufegcic said.

The testimony of witness Zorica Gjorcevska, Tufegcic, said that he fully corresponds to the statement of Aleksandar Gjorcevski and « from the ground to discredit the prosecution’s thesis that there were misunderstandings and disagreements ».

-The prosecutor’s prosecution and closing remarks because of his own powerlessness and lack of evidence to prove exactly what is a description in the indictment for Alexander, and that Alexander intent has helped the defendants to abduct his child, Be a father and a parent, a drug addict and a non -worker whose only goal was to make money – Tufegcic said.

During the indictment of the indictment during the proceedings he tried to prove Alexander’s involvement by his own with the vehicle to seek Vanja at several locations, the lawyer said that Zorica Gjorcevska’s statement confirmed that Alexander had neither hid nor Aracinovo, that he went to Blace…

-This proves that Alexander had no intention of hiding or concealing, on the contrary, Zorica informed about him. It has been proven that it is precisely the state of panic, fear, frustration, anxiety and internal disorder due to the disappearance of the child in Alexander was abused in a way that the actions that he himself took in such a stressful state after deciding to investigate himself in an attempt to find his own child at all costs. Confirmation of the above is the statement of witness Muzaffer Karisic, who said that he was subjective to his colleagues at that moment, that the father was confusing and strange – said Tufegcic.

The child’s parents and their family, according to Tufegcic, took exactly what every other parent would take in this situation and naturally doubted that the child was kidnapped especially as the parents themselves said, they knew their children very well, they were always available, they were always available, and they knew where they were, and they had no other, and they were now and knew where they were, and they were not going to do GPS Tracking of Movement with parents.

The defense also pointed out that the Public Prosecutor has submitted a notice of torture to Alexander on 18.01.2024 with a request for submission of two medical reports from a pre -trial judge of 16.02.2025 on the violations of the reporting of the procedure, as well as evidence from the report by the HELP. on the investigation.

The indictment of the indictment, Tufegcic said, acted contrary to the law, although he was obliged to forward this notice to the competent Public Prosecutor’s Office for GOCK-Disit to handle police officers for further action, but this was not done.

-This lump -sum and unfounded indictment for the child’s father is primarily a result of a superficial and improper investigation and violation of all the principles on which the foundations of the criminal investigation and the process of criminal profiling, which establish exclusively, the evidence that was to be found and the evidence was to be identified.

In this sense, as supplemented by the accused Alexander, it has proven that such indictment is a result of a violation of the basic principles on which the investigation and criminal investigation is resting, in which no preliminary analysis of the information was done, nor were their organization and differentiation.

« The evidence of the prosecution shows that the evidence of video surveillance on the basis of which the indictment is based has been provided and obtained by defendant Alexander and witness Goce, with knowledge, agreement and instructions from police officers who participated in the investigative procedure, » Tufegic said.

Finally, as the dynamics of events and evidence explained, the child’s father did not need the defendants at all to give instructions on the time when the child would come out of the home to go to school because according to the evidence of the defendants, a plan was already created, and later for the execution of a person, and later executed, As part of joint action to commit the criminal act, a month before the abduction, they decided to do so, followed and photographed the victim 10 days to two weeks before the abduction was found, and it was found that they had two unsuccessful abduction attempts on November 23 on November 23.

« On the basis of all the above I propose to the court to acquit the defendant Aleksandar Gjorcevski because the public prosecutor has not proved out of reasonable suspicion that the defendant committed the crime that is being charged with him, » Tufegljic concluded.

Earlier today, defense of defendants Velibor Manev, Bore Videvski and Vlatko Kesishev also demanded acquittal.

The defense of the defendant Ljupco Palevski should also give the final word.

At the past hearing, the Basic Public Prosecutor’s Office in his closing remarks requested a maximum sentence of life in prison for four defendants Palevski, Kesishev, Videvski and Manev, while, for Vanja’s father, defendant Aleksandar Gjorcevski asked the court to order him.

The indictment states that Palevski, Videvski, Manev, Kesishov and Gjorcevski together planned the abduction of 14-year-old Vanja in order to force a member of her immediate family to give money for ransom. The abduction of the damaged Pance Zezhovski in Veles, on the indictment, was intended to force him to give their « Citroen » vehicle to use it to abduct the child in Skopje.

The defendants said at the beginning of the trial that they did not feel guilty, and the first defendant Palevski claimed through the process that this was a politically mounted process.

Juvenile Vanja and Pance resident were reported missing on November 27 and 24, and on December 3, 2023, dead were found near Skopje and Veles.