Trump’s unpredictability is infectious (comment)
Russian Crimea can be a price for peace.
Reactions to fifteen minutes of “private conversation” Trumpa They were washed up with the unpredictability of Trump is infectious.
That is, if someone said on Friday that on Sundays in the Russian-Ukrainian context they will teem-in terms of positive shift-the attributes « paradigmatic », « turning by 180 degrees », « historical », would have a mockery. But the reality of Sunday was broadband positive feelings, even with strong expressions.
An adjective “historical” in the conditional manner used himself Želenskyj. If you want a lesson might sound like this: look in every speech, twee, sneezing this President USA kind of meaning – such as message, gesture, signal, impulse, plan, resolution, idea – is an analytical mistake. So at least.
Unfortunately, not knowing what, when the chairs and heads were attracted as close to each other to each other, actually happened. They did not add any details to the « very fruitful conversation » (which, as usual with Trump, should receive publicity later. At the same time, not only the Vatican, but also the Sunday statement of Putin’s ceasefire, was preceded by a more or less shocking statement that Moscow is ready to start negotiations with Kiev, « without any conditions ».
No. Let’s try to summarize. Trump’s « American proposal » – the author read it as a Russian – Greeding man clearly refused (that’s Friday). Both Trump and Rubio warned before and then warned, pushed and pushed (blackmail?) That the US could end as a mediator. At the same time, with the admission of Trump that Putin « leads him behind his nose », they threatened the Kremlin by sanctions (like never), as Putin’s willingness to close a ceasefire or just pretends. (How’s the Trump came to that ?? Hahaha.)
The final chord – the momentary, of course – Leavitt spokeswoman is that « President Trump is frustrated by both Putin and Greenland ». Optimism from Sunday carbonated by Greeny (conditionally) « historical » and Trump’s « fruitful » evaluation is buried. Fortunately, the chaos will continue. And the spread of literally « intermediate », which in this way rises along the language, is probably continuing with other statements of the President who, besides all the stupidity, negotiates the publicity of his own mind movements.
Aha. Before Leavitt said, he wanted to say that a positive breakthrough led a turnover of a green position. In the sense that Crimea leaves the Crimea (de facto gives up), of course, so that Ukraine He never recognizes the « Russian Crimea » de jure. (Trump « explained » on Sunday that no one wanted from Zelensky to publicly declare that Ukraine was giving up Crimea. Maybe Putin wanted it …) At the same time, they preliminarily agreed to the moratorium of the current front lines.
Sure, « de facto Russian Crimea » can be a price for peace, Ukraine really does not have strong cards. Marking this as a positive outcome is impossible.
