Trump reverses Stefanik’s nomination for the UN – Diepresse.com
Republican MP Elise Stefanik should not become a US ambassador for the United Nations.
US President Donald Trump withdrew the nomination of the 40-year-old due to a tight majority in the US House of Representatives. It is important that the Republicans kept each of their seats in the parliamentary chamber, Trump wrote on his online language tube Truth Social. « There are others who can do a good job with the United Nations. »
The Republicans currently hold 218 seats in the US House of Representatives, the Democrats 213. At the November election, the Republicans had actually won 220 seats – an already narrow majority in the parliamentary chamber. Also because Trump used the MPs for his government team, two seats are not occupied, they are on the post -elections.
Posts already delayed
Since Republicans have so far not been able to afford to lose another voice due to important votes, Stefanik’s confirmation of the post in the UN has already been delayed. There should also be a by -election for Stefanik’s free seat. Your constituency in the state of New York is considered republican. But in the presidential elections in 2008 and 2012 the Democrat won there Barack Obama. The Republicans also fear that the democratic New York governor Kathy Hochul could delay the by -election.
However, there was also concerns about the anti -elections in Florida, which was scheduled for early April. The race of the Republican Randy Fine threatens to be scarce than expected. He applies to the seat of Mike Waltzwhich Trump brought into the White House as his security advisor.
Stefanik is a « glowing Trump supporter »
Trump had nominated Stefanik shortly after his election victory for the position of the United Nations. It is considered a loyal allied Trumps and was also behind his false claims about alleged fraud in the presidential election in 2020. In 2014 she was the youngest woman who was elected to the House of Representatives at the age of 30.
Stefanik was once one of the more moderate members of the party. There can be no question of that now. It became a broad public by surveying Harvard’s university presidents who University of Pennsylvania and known to the Massachusetts Institute for Technology. At that time it was about anti-Semitism in the course of the Gaza protests. (APA)
