This is a coup (reactions to the development of the Constitutional Court election)
Dnevnik publishes some of the opinions on the latest actions of the institutions in the election case, without claims to be exhaustive. In them, the word « coup » is repeated often.
Inadmissible interference with the uncontrolled prosecutor's office
Adela Kachaunova, lawyer, co -chair of the Bulgarian Helsinki Committee
The statement of the chairman of the Constitutional Court made before national television must serve to awaken the nation. Information Services Instead of handing over the results of the Constitutional Court, he handed them over to the Sofia City Prosecutor's Office. Why they did so we can hardly understand. Thus, the Constitutional Court cannot rule on the legality of the election.
| Colleagues have already defined this as a coup and it is just that. Absolutely unacceptable interference with the uncontrolled prosecutor's office. |
The results:
– even lower confidence in elections;
– a hypothetical fall of the government, which leads to other effects:
– freezing the election in regulators and another postponement of entry into the euro area. Entering it is extremely important at this moment of reorientation of our country.
It may sound boutique, but this statement by Pavlina Panova should take the tables out of the street to insist on legitimacy and justice.
The Constitutional Court has accused of sabotage institutions after the prosecutor's office seized material in the election case
| « What happens and caused the unprecedented and firm response of the President of the Constitutional Court Pavlina Panova, is very close to the concept of usurping of state power and actual suspension of the constitution! « , Wrote on Facebook from the » Justice for Everyone « initiative. Their representative lawyer Velislav Velichkov commented that » the chairman of the Constitutional Court has been reported in practice of a coup d'état committed by a state body and the prosecutor's office! « |
KS cannot form the share of « Information Services » and the prosecutor's office can
Andrey Yankulov, a former prosecutor, a senior legal expert in the anti -corruption fund
The Vice-President of the Supreme Court of Cassation and the head of his Criminal College said a while ago on television that after the prosecutor's office asked the sacks of material evidence from the property of the euro, potentially concerning Sarafov and ended up in the HCC under the new mechanism for his independent investigation, he could not give them. She would hinder justice, she could form her deed and so on.
Well, how do you expect some ordinary clerks from « Information Services » not to give the materials for the constitutional case when the prosecutor's office asked them!?
But they did not ask the Constitutional Court that what to ask him for, he could not form them and spend them as a fair bears for years on the courts, and the prosecutor's office could.
| « This intervention is not just a procedural trick – it is an attack on the last institution that could restore confidence in the election process. If the Constitutional Court is blocked, citizens are left without protection against usurping democracy. The question is: How long will we endure power built on a lie and institutions serving close party interests instead of the people? « From a comment by Ilian Vasilev, former Dimplomat |
This is in the interest of parallel power
Vladislav Panev, a former MP and former Green Movement leader
Instead of the Constitutional Court, the State Information Services Company handed over the flash drives with the results of the elections of the Sofia City Prosecutor's Office. The point is to delay as much as possible the reformatting of parliament. So the majority is withheld as long as possible.
The breakdown of confidence in institutions is underway. This is always in the interest of parallel power. And it's practically a coup.
The problem is that the election in Bulgaria cannot be trusted
Emilia Milcheva, journalist
I opened the CEC data on the elections on October 27 this year to see the protocols of the two sections in Ognyanovo, the Municipality of Garmen, one of the places where there are no ballots from the sacks. In both sections in Ognyanovo the winner is Peevski with his « MRF – New Beginning ». The same is the situation in Belitsa, where he is the closest to Peevski man – Mayor Revanski.
On the signal of « Information Services », the prosecutor's office seizes everything that is needed by the Constitutional Court to rule on the contested elections. Thus, the prosecution not only acts in someone's service, but against democracy.
| The problem is no longer only in the missing voices of « greatness » (though I'm not a fan of them), the problem is that the elections in Bulgaria and the results they produce can not be trusted. |
Will it turn out that the election makes no sense because they are resolved by the prosecutor's office, company and service
Petio Tsekov, journalist, « now »
I did not think that the drama surrounding the Romanian Constitutional Court and their presidential election could soon be approached. You know, they held elections, they didn't like it, they canceled them – now they are selected carefully the candidates
Such an example was only in Malawi 5-6 years ago – and there they voted, canceled, voted again. But we also headed in this direction. The elections produce some results, everyone doubts them, the CS orders the results to be recalculated on the basis of an expert inspection, but the prosecutor's office appears here and the results of the experts of the SC appears
| This is some kind of madness. The Constitutional Court is not some institution, some institution. The Constitutional Order is the guardian of the constitutional order and as such appears almost like the Second Chamber of Parliament, but most importantly, only the Constitutional Court decides the legality of the election. |
If the Information Services company, the CEC and the Sofia City Prosecutor's Office interfere with the work of the Constitutional Court, as it claims, this country is Better Romania and Malawi.
The CEC gave 24 hours to Information Services to enter the data and return the results. And if this does not happen until 3pm tomorrow, then the election makes no sense, because they are decided not by the citizens, but by the prosecutor's office, company and service.
The Constitutional Court commissioned CEC a new calculation of election results
The « Analysis » section presents different perspectives, it is not necessarily the expressed opinions that they coincide with the editorial position of Dnevnik.
