There is no peace with hoods that call us Ustashas – Personal views

After these bombastic messages, the following questions are imposed:

First, who kidnapped our state? Second, who don’t we give a state of Serbia? And the third question, how do we not give something, when is it already kidnapped?

All this looks like an absurde theater from the 1950s – a listless human actions, procedures and words with stirring real and unreal. However, the authors of our dramas are neither cam, neither Jonesko nor Beck, but the President of the Republic of Serbia and the current government.

Who, and when, the authoritarian leader, Caesaristic confidentiality, could overcome the state, as a spoiled child beloved toy? Is anyone in this country an acceptable thought that someone, in addition to the president, controls and commands the government, army, police, judiciary, state security … and all the way to the local community? Who, in this state, from our pairs, donates local roads, waterworks, schools, electric pillars … jobs?

At the same time, as a sign of national and state irresponsibility, I consider the division of our citizens by the President of the Republic to « our » and « their ». His classification aside the so-called. « Better, decent Serbia » and by signing divisions among citizens, he flagrantly violates the Constitution, Article 111. and instead of advocating communion and cohesion, he amplifies the centuries-old Češud – divisions.

Of course, the question arises – in what way the current government thinks that the « abducted state » of, I guess, authentic youth people embedded in the collective of equal and self-organized students, who are only fighting injustice, corruption and captured institutions. Does it take place in this restrictions on numerous obscure persons under hoods, which are located for weeks and circulates in front of the Presidency of the Republic of Serbia, and now in front of the National Assembly?

Otherwise, who approves it, organizes and funded? Our opposition, this undefined and aggressive group of citizens, was welcomed and escorted from the National Assembly with noisy shouts: « Ustashas! ». At the same time, the current authority calls for cooperation and harmonization of relations. About Tempora, about the Mores.

I note that in every normal and arranged state, diversity and diversity in knowledge, ideas and views of society development, especially from « student source », were accepted as a wealth and strategic commitment. My lifelong experience says that the best unity is what does not exclude diversity, including political diversity. Student and youth movement in Serbia indicates that we cannot separate the goal and resources, and that democracy is not an external goal already a practice, its life itself. In this, this movement for us is the citizens of the role model, and more and more for sleep.

All this gets in an even greater importance in our country, where accident is catching up, tragedy tragedy, affair affair, corruption corruption, embezzlement of embezzlement. Students, through the Gandial approach, only speaks of normal life, worthy man, about refreshment and quality transforms, and the current government calls them, « Bahatim Mamacima », « Fascist Falangam », « terrorists » and « Llotićevci ».

In all these problems and divisions, the new Government of Serbia, and by the program, and by composition does not provide discontinuity with the previous failed government. What kind of personnel policy, when after nine months of work, the President of the Republic says that it should « change more than half of the ministers ». So, who suggested them? Who is responsible for these catastrophic errors in the staffing policy, which cost, primarily, Serbia?

A serious personnel policy is not guided by saying that someone « should be given a chance. » This is not about raffle that does not bring a chance to most losers, but about the most appropriate political figure and political body in the Republic of Serbia. And instead of solid arguments and convictions with coverage in serious biographies, citizens offer unrealistic promises and hopes. And this government is relieved of incompetent ministers without any socio-political experience. Frivolous and irresponsible.

The Government Program has been exited, by Professor Macuta’s mandate, does not bring anything new. The mandateard was celebrating about « cooperation and harmonization of relations », but, as a doctor, did not remember the obligation to meet the sixth request of students in the blockade.
Namely, the entry of the President of the Republic with numerous journalists and cameramen in intensive care, where patients with severe burns were treated, due to possible severe hospital infections, the lives of these patients were brought to immediate danger. The Law on Health Care, Article 15, paragraph 1, the law on patients’ rights, Articles 10, 14 and 21. The doctors also violated the Hippocratic oath and the Code of Medical Ethics. The doctor-mandateard has not shown the expected and necessary responsibility and co-formation on this issue.

On the contrary, introductory exposure and through a modest and unconvincing discussion, the mandateur was a very dangerous and manipulative propaganda machinery that student / civic protests, universities, rectors and dies, disgusting in our society, politicization of universities and absence of responsibility. In doing so, it is intentionally « forgotten » that student protests are just a consequential (rewarded) ignorance of members and sympathizers of ruling parties, incompetence, corruption, enhancement of most, accumulation of trauma and accidents, authoritarian and autistic government, etc. Therefore, here and now, students only apply doctrine from human medicine – doctors first treats the cause of disease, and then consequential symptoms that follow that clinical entity. Dear Macut Colleague should know about an essential postulate in human medicine – no consequence without causes (Lat. Nullus Effectus Son Causa).

That is why the education system has been violated for the existing situation, a responsible current authority who does not meet student requirements. SNS power or it cannot (missing or perhaps, timely sheltered documentation) or, even worse, does not want (probably, protection of certain persons). The worst thing is that the actual power is that in the circuit, to avoid responsibility, shares, oppose huka « students who want to learn » against demonstrators, who allegedly « do not want to learn. Dangerous and absurd division. Thousands of students, through 36 generations, I educated and introduced into the magical world of medicine, and everyone wanted to learn, realizing that quality education without morality does not have the desired value.

After the last session of the National Assembly, and the election of the new-old government, at the cost of further division, primary and upcoming corruption actions, would accept reasonable proposals of the opposition for the state, finally, exit from an abnormal, destructive Socio-political crises with inconsistible consequences. They would all participate in normal (fair and honest) elections, and the current government would have, more or less, a real chance to stay in power. On the other hand, citizens must understand that the outcome of voting does not depend on Aleksandar Vučić and its assholes, but from citizens who are silent and not voting. Thus, they do not become victims, but accomplices.

That is why in this crucial moment for our Serbia, the active assistance of each citizen with successful and, above all, clean biography. During the clinical work and numerous social activities, I met thousands of professionally successful people with solid ethical principles, all nationalities and faith, that political activity, unfortunately, perceive as something immoral and unproductive. However, the essence and truth are in the words of Jovan Skerlić, from 100 years ago: « Political activity is concerned about public good. » Let’s listen to Skerlic, we won’t repent.

The author is a full professor at the Faculty of Medicine in Belgrade, Pension Member of Serbia of Serbia Center (Heart)

The author’s attitudes in the dialogue not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Danas.