The wrong judicial order for the finding of EDOASAM

« The Supreme Court prosecutor’s Office is calling for any … suspicious actions in the investigation into Tempihowever, which are absolutely legal and are accurately described in the State Research Agency report! Some have created the completely wrong picture that in the finding of the National Air Force and Transport Security Investigation Organization (EDOASAM), which was considered by the government a « research gospel » on the case of Tempi, a survey of the University of Ghentas, a survey of the University of Ghentas. It is completely false since this university was generally asked only for a general simulation model used by Greek researchers.

The misunderstanding arises from only one inappropriate statement by the President of the Organization Mr. Papadimitriou. And so some pro -government media who contacted the university incorrectly assessed the statement of representatives of the foreign educational institution that they « did not issue such findings », as a denial of EPAAAM, the multi -page document of which he never wrote. The organization’s finding clearly stated that what was asked by Ghent was to see the parameters of the model in the Greek experiment. Foreign academics have never been asked to deal with the essence of the Tempe’s explosion.

The wrong judicial order for the finding of EDOASAM

So something was denied something that didn’t exist. In addition, the Supreme Court Public Prosecutor’s Office considers that any … suspicious role of the territory (Independent Experts Committee of Independent Experts) and the highly experienced expert Kostas Lakafosi must be investigated, which are accurately described in the finding of EDASAAM. Given that it is a purely scientific effort and cooperation to explore the conditions of the explosion that cost the lives of at least 5-7 passengers of the train burned alive. And of course, a bona fide scientific research cannot be criminalized with absolute objectivity and transparency. « 

These reports were made by speaking to in in -law and experts following the alleged « denials » by the University of Ghentos of EPAAAM and other elements that create subversive data in the Tempe case. Claims allegedly caused intervention by the Supreme Court’s prosecutor’s office with strong communication characteristics calling for these alleged « disagreements » of the University of Ghent.

And all this when huge questions are raised by the strange delay in the delivery of the finding by the NTUA School of Chemical Engineering who had been studying from March 2024 to investigate the causes of the fiery mushroom that occurred after the collision of the two trains. In order to give a definitive solution since about 15-16 findings have been drafted for this explosion, and half of which, mainly by state agencies and Hellenic Train and 2-3 individuals who associate fireplace with silicone oils. With other families and others who conclude that these oils are short -lived and are not linked to the explosion. « 

The last three days, therefore, was attempted to shake, through statements by researchers from the University of Ghent, as a whole of the state EDOSAMA’s report on the causes of the deadly fireplace and any illegal load. Persistently in the theory that the explosion is due to « silicone oils of transformers of the train ».

The order of the Supreme Court’s prosecutor’s office is therefore requested to « carry out an urgent preliminary examination in order to investigate the circumstances under which the National Organization of Air Force and Transport Security and Transport Security (EODASA), 27) (by invoking the contribution of the universities of Ghent and Pisa) it was considered as a possible cause of the fireplace, created shortly after the train collisions, an unknown flying flammable fluid of at least 2.5 tonnes, allegedly transported by the trading carriage. Also, to investigate, among other things, which role played in the wording of the above conclusion by the Committee for Investigation of Independent Experts Families (TEOPO) and the Temple Families’ Technical Advisor of the Tempi Kostas Lakafosi. « 

However, researchers in the case have noted in relation to the « failures » of this order and the relevant festive references to the « reversal » of the climate in the Tempe case that « in the finding of EPANAAM, everyone should remember that there is a report by the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, not by the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki. Scenario of pro -government circles.

Regarding the conclusion of EPASAAM where there are allegations that he is citing a « special study » of the Ghent University of Ghent on the illegal burden and the explosion and that this denying a representative of the Belgian University the truth is completely different.

According to this particular excerpt from the EDASSAM exhibition, the University of Ghent had done no experiment on the origin of the fireplace and the illegal burden of Ghent University dealing with the methodology and parameters of the explosion of the explosion of the explosion. And who are the ones who have come to the conclusion that it is related to two tonnes of hydrocarbon loads that may have carried the train.

As noted in the EPANAAM report, « the University of Pisa and the University of Ghent have offered an opinion on the scientific validity of the CFD analysis on the modeling of the ignorance.

In addition, EPANAAM assigned a contract at the University of Ghent to re -examine work on the CFD analysis of the accident in Tempi, as was already done by Edapo. This review resulted in a report that provided a technical opinion on the validity of variables and modeling parameters used so far in CFD simulations to reproduce the fact as recorded by cameras with the most realistic scenarios. Adaptation of some of the variables and parameters has led to an improved and more reliable set of simulations and CFD resolution.  » That is, the foreign university was investigated only if the experiment was done by taking into account all the correct data, not in substance. That is why his representatives said we do not know anything about the reasons for the explosion. And not because there was some suspicious energy.

Concerning the investigation requested by the Supreme Court’s prosecutor’s office for the TAA … mysterious, « dark » role of the territory that had made relevant simulations of the explosion, a mere reading of the state’s finding of the state was sufficient. And he would certainly show that there is nothing suspicious. As noted in this again on page 136, « under the supervision of the soil, computing dynamic fluid simulations (CFD) were performed in an attempt to recreate the event as recorded by the cameras using only mathematical computer models and their visualization tools. »

Finally, some overpower the statements of a two relatives of the victims of the Tempe tragedy that the deadly explosion is sure to be due to silicone oils. With the consequent criticism and challenge of the experienced expert Mr. Lakafosi (he has a degree in engineer from HEI) who has been involved in a series of dramatic events (Traffic Police, Railway accidents, etc.).

But they forget that the same people (who have the absolute understanding of everyone) a few weeks ago- and specifically on January 21, 2025 that « they gave the command of the boom »- Triantopoulos, Stylianidis, Mitsotakis buried the details to cover the details! « 

Also a few months ago they had reported in their social media that « we have 5-6 experts telling us about wood » expressing confidence that this flammable substance is related to the deadly explosion. With experts likely to attribute this change to their attitude to prompts of their new legal advisers.