mai 21, 2025
Home » « The World of Tomorrow » in Mumok – Diepresse.com

« The World of Tomorrow » in Mumok – Diepresse.com

« The World of Tomorrow » in Mumok – Diepresse.com


Barbara Kapusta and Anita Witek go on time travel with three other artists in the museum: they look into the 1920s and in the morning with their own work and collection objects of the Mumok.

There is a bracket on the ground, and a hand embedded on air cushion film is tolerated until Barbara Kapusta positions it in the room. The Viennese visual artist is for her multimedia work, in which she deals with materials and, in addition to objects, shows animation films and wall designs, 2020 with the Otto Wall Prize was honored for visual arts. Now the Mumok has invited you to play a museum level. It is about the « World of Tomorrow »: an exhibition title in which the « World of Yesterday » described by Stefan Zweig sounds, that of the spirit of optimism in the 1920s before the political events then overturned and fascism lay over Europe.

Christine Pichler

« />

In the world of tomorrow that Barbara Kapusta draws, different forms of existence coexist and find a common way despite friction.Christine Pichler

Conflicts among neighbors from 1920 and 2020

The show is now connecting to this past decade, whereby the world of tomorrow in Mumok will « have been another present »: with the puzzled title addition, curator Franz Thalmair wants to link this yesterday from 100 years ago to today and future questions. To do this, he has invited five contemporary artists to entangle their current positions with those of classical modernism that they selected in advance from the museum’s existence in order to recover the story from today’s perspective and to have the work react to each other.

One of the five is now Kapusta, the works of which can stand out a little like aliens from the future from the rest of the exhibition area in the construction phase. This is also justified in terms of content, as a setting, Kapusta prefers to choose scenarios of the future state of the world as it imagines it. In a corner, her video work « Emphatic Creatures » from 2018 will run, in which she simulates a post -apocalyptic landscape. In it, the brackets and the hand from the museum floor now play in digitally animated form, they encounter an eight and an o, breathing, ruffle and break, combine with the other elements. « How strange can bodies be? How do you find a common form or language? », Kapusta calls questions behind it.

How can we live together?

Barbara Kapusta's bracket can be converted into her material, sometimes it is an object made of ceramic, sometimes it appears digitally animated in a video work. Christine Pichler

« />

Barbara Kapusta’s bracket can be converted into her material, sometimes it is an object made of ceramic, sometimes it appears digitally animated in a video work.Christine Pichler

Body and language are recurring elements that colonize Kapustas art in various media. Sentences from her video have also found a place on the wall as a font, Kapusta, for example, stuck « a Society of Empathy » in white letters there. Behind their idea of ​​bodies that disassemble and then multiply are thoughts of a possible future community and inclusive. « The essence may be the question of how we can live together and how we talk about differences and conflicts in neighborhoods. »

In Barbara Kapusta's art, parts of the body can take different conditions and dissolve, hands keep returning to her. Christine Pichler

« />

In Barbara Kapusta’s art, parts of the body can take different conditions and dissolve, hands keep returning to her.Christine Pichler

Visions of the « new » person

She painted the sentence « This is the space we inhabit as Neighbours » on a wall, only if you know if Kapustas knows how to interpret capustas specially developed: For each letter there is a black flame picture, together they draw a future that is determined by heat. If this does not promise anything good for the environment, utopian possibilities are about becoming more physically resistant to Kapusta. Large and sexless aluminum creatures, which she placed in front of the flame wall, have the idea of ​​a new way of life.

Visions of the future “new” person designed in the 1920s, in classical modernism, also Oskar Schlemmer, his “abstract figure” from the museum collection has put Kapusta next to theirs. She also chose body and figures from Herbert Bayer, Alicia Penalba and Friedl Dicker-Brandeis for the show, because she also noticed how lifeless things come alive and body mechanical, human features dissolve. The technology was stronger at the time, it indicates a significant difference in the neighborhood of 1920 and 2020, which noticed it in the comparison.

The Community -free

« />

The « abstract figure », which Oskar Schlemmer designed between 1921 and 1923, is one of the works that Barbara Kapusta contrasts her characters. The Bauhaus artist thought about the ideal person in symbiosis with the technology.Community -free

Appropriation of image ideas of classic modernism

Instead of thinking in progress, Kapusta wants to integrate into a more critical discourse: « Technology is today a form of preservation of rule when I think of algorithms and racist data from AI. » The fact that artist biographies were affected by National Socialism at the time is another aspect that she wants to look at critically, for her, among other things, the works by George Grosz stand for her. « We often find flight and displacement behind the works of classic modernism. I sometimes lack discourse. »

Anita Witek has shown a sculpture by Brâncuși, the influential sculptor from the 20th century, a padded reverence. Christine Pichler

« />

Anita Witek has shown a sculpture by Brâncuși, the influential sculptor from the 20th century, a padded reverence.Christine Pichler

Anita Witek recognized that despite the differences in a hundred years of art history, there was also considerable parallels, as well as she searched the collection for participation in the show. « Raoul Hausmann and I share a moment in history, » she says, astonished how the image ideas of her collages are entangled with those of the former Dadaist. If he wanted to expose bourgeoisie with photo montages at the time, Witek today addresses the flooding through mass media. For her work, she resorted to snippets from books and magazines such as the popular science magazine « PM ». « My working method is a critical question of what we see because the topic of our time is image competence for me. »

Art historiography and image competence

For her series « unpredictable events », she cut out the specific objects from photos, instead shows empty spaces and non -non -non -image backgrounds, made great prints out of apparently minor details, which she represents. She transferred some excerpts to fabric and seams in the form of symbols that she invented. The shape of a sculpture by the sculptor Constantin Brâncuși is also under the Pölstern, from which Witek in turn found a portrait of Edward Steichen from 1925, whose color now fits into her collage as agreed. « Collecting is always a selection process, and what a museum has collected that is the highest authority for the canon is exciting. »

Anita Witek prints snippets from magazines and books on fabric and sews Pölster with the cutouts. Christine Pichler

« />

Anita Witek prints snippets from magazines and books on fabric and sews Pölster with the cutouts.Christine Pichler

Her room installation in the Mumok, which she calls « The Collector’s Room », is intended to disclose time layers and open rooms to the past. In her work, she picked up “escalating commitment” that this also tells yesterday, for which she cut pictures from Frankfurt Airport. In the 1920s, flying was still pioneering performance. « Today print media and the importance of flying as freedom are obsolete again. »

Read more on these topics:



View Original Source

Tags: , , ,