The supreme opens a third cause to the Eurodiputa Alvise for throwing messages against prosecutor Susana Gisbert | Spain

The Supreme Court has opened another cause on Monday, the third in a month, to the MEP Luis Pérez, known as Alvite. The Criminal Chamber will investigate the leader of the party (Salf) for several messages that he directed through Telegram against the Delegate Prosecutor of Crimes of Hate and Discrimination of Valencia, Susana Gisbert. The instructor of this case will be, in turn, Judge Juan Ramón Berdugo.

The open cause is now added to The other two investigations that the Supreme already has Against the Ultra Agitator: one for the financing of SALF, its electoral group and another for disseminating a false Covid Test by Salvador Illa. And the Criminal Chamber still has to decide if it also opens causes at least three other complaints on the table.

The open investigation is now based on the reasoned exhibition that sent a Court of Valencia to the high court, which had opened proceedings after the complaint of prosecutor Gisbert for an alleged crime of insults to public official, coercion and hate. In her complaint, the prosecutor gave an account of messages that had been disclosed in a Telegram chat and that had led to people she did not know to send her threatening or insulting messages through social networks.

The message Alvise published on Telegram spread personal data from Gisbert, to which the agitator Ultra indicated for pursuing hate crimes. « These people are the one who is fine and trying to put thousands of Spaniards in prison to say that the massive illegal immigration is an invasion. They are organized by cities. Let’s look ‘Invasion’ together. « 

The Supreme, after study Stalking The magistrates point out that the now Eurodiput made « a call to a group close to 40,000 followers » to express and develop « an animosity » towards the prosecutor. In addition, the room warns, Alvise made a second appeal to mobilize his followers after many of them had expressed their intention to act against Gisbert and his family.

The Court warns in this attitude of the SALF leader « a voluntary and conscious intention to compromise, in a permanent and deep way, the normal development of the daily life of its victim, from the persecution that the hundreds of people who assume their challenge could deploy. » These facts fit the crime of harassment cited by the magistrates.