The supreme incorporates into the prosecutor’s cause the report that proves that Ayuso’s boyfriend also sent his email to the State Advocacy | Spain

Judge Ángel Hurtado, Instructor of the open case in the Supreme Court Against the State Attorney General for Revelation of Secrets, he has admitted this Thursday The prosecution’s request to incorporate an expert report into the summary That he notes that the email that focuses the investigation had not only sent to the Public Ministry but also to the State Advocacy. This report has been prepared by the State Advocacy to prove before the High Court that this mail was never forwarded by the State lawyer who received it and, therefore, this cannot be suspected of its filtration. But the Prosecutor’s Office, in a appeal filed before the judge, warns that this document has an « unquestionable transcendence » for the investigation because Ayuso’s couple had not referred so far « that a similar, or identical mail, to the one sent to the Prosecutor’s Office had been sent the same day to the State’s law, which should be the object of explanation. »

In a providence issued on Wednesday, to which the country has had access, Hurtado agrees to incorporate into the cause the expert report of the law and, with it, the copy of the email sent by the defense of González Amador to a state lawyer. In that mail, sent on February 2, 2024 and whose filtration attributes the supreme to Álvaro García Ortizthe lawyer admitted that his client had committed two fiscal crimes and proposed to the Prosecutor’s Office a pact that would free him from entering the jail. The investigation of the State Attorney General is based on the fact that the content of that mail began to be published in the media shortly after, at 21.59 of March 13, the provincial chief prosecutor of Madrid, Pilar Rodríguez, also charged, was forwarded to García Ortiz. But the judge has not managed to collect evidence that confirms or denies that García Ortiz was the author of the filtration.

The State Advocacy, defender of the two accused prosecutors, maintains in one of its resources that the fact that Ayuso’s boyfriend sent his proposal for a agreement in which he admitted the commission of two crimes to a state lawyer He could not be part of any action, nor any member of it could be formally responsible for any file, since he was not invited to appeal but after all the controversial facts. ”

For the law, the fact that González Amador’s lawyer sent to this institution that same mail a few minutes after having sent it to the Prosecutor’s Office assumes that the lawyer already broke at that time the alleged confidentiality in his relations with the Public Ministry. Sources of the defense of both prosecutors have insisted that these new data show that González Amador has repeatedly cheated the Supreme Court by making him think that only the Prosecutor’s Office could have the emails or information, when in reality it was Ayuso’s boyfriend who manipulated the public opinion filtering another mail and partial and misrepresented information of the procedure.