The Signalgate affair is even worse. Politicians lied, journalists also found their slogans
27. Mar 2025 at 18:19
I
Ministers lied before Congress.
Washington, BRATISLAVA. « Anyone who wears a uniform would go to the military court for this, » he told for American station CNN a person from the security environment to the margo A affairs of Signalgate.
The top representatives of the United States, from Vice President to Defense Minister to the Secret Services Chief in the Signal Chatting application, discussed military plans for an air attack against the terrorist group of Húsís in Yemen.
In addition, they inadvertently joined the editor -in -chief of The Atlantic Jeffrey Goldberg, who wrote about the incident.
« This type of information is not taken on unsecured systems to protect the lives and safety of the soldiers who were going into the attack. If we did it, it would be totally irresponsible, it knows every beginning analyst, » said the expert addressed.
The Signalgate case has its reverberations, but has not yet deprived of none of the participants.
They despise Europe and their own security. What did the leak of information through the Signal have shown Read
Defense Minister Pete Hegseth, Tulsi Gabbard and director head CIA On various occasions, John Ratcliffe was caught by lies when they made the affair in various ways and claiming that there was no secret information in the conversation.
Moreover, politicians began to defend themselves by attacking a journalist who eventually published the conversation content to prove that there were actually military secrets.
The participants of the scandal also applies to the new finding that brought German on Thursday Magazine Spiegel . His reporters managed to find e-mail addresses, telephone numbers and passwords on the Internet by Tulsi Gabbard, Pete Hegseth and Michael Waltz, advisor Donald Trump for national security.
Washington is another colossal safety failure.
In the article you can read:
- As America is looking for a culprit of a scandal.
- Why the journalist published information that he did not want to publish first.
- What we know so far the new security failure of the same people.
They were saved by a journalist
The consequences of the affair is not yet carried by no one. Jeffrey Goldberg’s journalist was mistakenly added to the conversation by Michael Waltz, a presidential advisor to national security.
Sample of conversation:
- Hegseth: 11.44, the weather is suitable, we have green from the headquarters.
- At 12.15 take-off of the first attack F-18
- At 13.45 time window on the first attack F-18 (the terrorist is in a well-known place at the famous time), the MQ-9 drones will fly.
- At 14.10 take-off another F-18 (second attack).
- 14.15 Drone attack on the target (now the first bombs will certainly fall, depending on the hit of the previous goals).
- At 15.36 the second attack will start, then the first tomahawky from the sea will detonate.
Trump According to NBC He said he had added a journalist « someone from Michael’s people. The official put the number there ». If he is right, another person who probably didn’t see them could have been found to be classified.
President He stressed that the presence of a journalist in the conversation had no effect on the course of military operation. This is true just because Goldberg refused to publish the most serious reports to avoid damaging US security interests.
Published them Only when the politicians concerned began to deceive that they did not take secret facts in the signal and blamed Goldberg that they were deceiving when he claimed the opposite. After the publication, it is clear that the participants actually discussed detailed combat plans. If they got to the public before the attack, they could endanger US soldiers, because the air defense of the Húsi could be prepared for them.
Trump and his people began to call it dirt and a luster, and even Waltz himself joined the swearing, who accidentally added a journalist to the conversation.
While Trump pointed to Waltza, Gabbard and CIA Ratcliffe chief had to confess Congress. The question of whether the signal contained classified information or not was avoided and the congressans referred to Defense Minister Pete Hegseth, who he believes to decide to determine the confidentiality of the information.
The numbers have on the Internet
[email protected] to help you.
