mai 13, 2025
Home » The serial killer wanted to be free, the Helsinki Court of Appeal blocked

The serial killer wanted to be free, the Helsinki Court of Appeal blocked

The serial killer wanted to be free, the Helsinki Court of Appeal blocked

The woman has been sitting in five murders for over sixteen years now.

Read the summary

The abstract is made by artificial intelligence and checked by man.

The Helsinki Court of Appeal dismissed the application of five murders for the conditional freedom of Ann Maria Gyllgren.

Gyllgren has been sitting for more than 16 years, exceeding the average imprisonment of life.

The Court of Appeal considered the quantity and quality of the crimes and the imprisonment of the risk of violence.

Helsinki The Court of Appeal refused to allow the so -called poisonous women who have been convicted of the conditional freedom.

In his judgment on Tuesday, the Court of Appeal dismissed Ann Maria Gyllgren application. He was previously known as, among other things, the name Aino Nykopp.

The judgment means that Gyllgren, 74, will continue at least for the time being and there is no information on the end of it.

He has been sitting for his life sentence for over sixteen years, while the average imprisonment of his life is fourteen and ten months.

On the conditional Many things were prevented by access. According to the Court of Appeal, the quantity and quality of crimes, especially five murders, speak against liberation. In relation to them, the sentence has been short.

The Court of Appeal also made the importance of being convicted of five attempts at the same time.

« The Court of Appeal considers that Gyllgren must be punished by his crimes well over 12 years, and the quality and quantity of the crimes also support the exceeding the average prison prison of life prisoners, » the Court of Appeal said.

However, it did not specify how much imprisonment there would still be.

His liberation was also an obstacle to what his risk was re -committed by the violent crime. This assessment of violence mentioned in the judgment is completely encrypted.

The Criminal Sanctions Agency did not support his liberation.

When considering the whole, the court stated that Gyllgren had not to consider having sufficiently penalized in prison for the offenses for which he was sentenced to life imprisonment.

Gyllgren Was sentenced to life -long in the spring of 2012. According to the Court of Appeal, he firmly killed five times and tried to kill five times as a basic nurse and home nurse, giving the victims secretly treating non -treatment medications.

He had pre -acquired them and brought them to the patient rooms or home care clients. According to the Court of Appeal, the acts were targeted at completely defenseless patients due to age and poor health.

In its judgment, the Court of Appeal now take into account the fact that his imprisonment has gone well, the objectives of the sentence have progressed and he has not committed new crimes.



View Original Source