The second coach of the Rapid, at the verge of death

Last Sunday he played in the Superliga the Bucharest derby Rapid -FCSB, concluded with the victory of the guest band with a score of 2-1. But the result was vitiated by the fact that the referee Radu Petrescu, Ebuson FIFA and UEFA, with matches this season in the Champions League and the one in the Var cabin, Ovidiu Hațegan, did not grant a clear penalty to the clear fault in the Carea Târnovanu on the noevegian Christensen.

The mistake was so big and clear that both were banned from the central referees commission to run another match until this season, ie for four stages. The leadership of the Rapid, coach Marius Șumudică and some of the players publicly expressed their indignation for these arbitration errors considered premeditated.

But more serious than the lost points in the standings, which almost remove the fast from the fight for a European place, is that without wanting the two could contribute to the death of a man, who upset a heart attack and was operated on.

The second coach of the Rapid, Cristi Petre (57 years old), was on the verge of death after Rapid-FCSB 1-2. The technician suffered a heart attack and was operated on the Emergency University Hospital in Bucharest, and is currently outside any danger. Cristi Petre was put two stents in his heart and are outside any danger.

In his unmistakable style Marius Șumudică detailed the public event, at the press conference before the match in the Superliga in Craiova.
« I went to the hospital yesterday. He was lucky, fate! He was lucky, I saw him that it was not ok during the match, on the way home he fainted. I told him the next day to go to the doctor, he refused, and in the end I felt bad and our luck that I found a doctor.
I asked him nice to stay in place, ‘my second feels very bad.’ He sent me a message 20 minutes after he arrived, he told me it was dust, that he was entering the operating room, heart attack. Two minutes had shook hands with St. Peter and brought him back to life.
Maybe I’m a more expansive guy who eliminates, a guy who doesn’t hold in me. He is a guy who holds in him, who is consumed, I saw. I still have one that is the same. I am more expansive, quarreling, I externalize, I do not hold in me very much.
Today I did my analysis. I have known him for 30 years, I was a colleague, he wrote to me last night and he said I was his angel, that I saved his life. If he came to training and catch him on the road, maybe he was only among us at the moment. Tragic things. It was my second. «