The murder of RTS workers and murder under the canopy are two state crimes – personal views

– NATO attacks immediately condemned all the world’s main organizations for the protection of human rights and journalists’ associations, in the first place Amnesti International, as an unauthorized attack on the civilized goal, ie. violation of the Geneva War Convention;

– NATO defended that he had previously placed knowledgeable at the press conference that he would attack Serbian state television as a « military propaganda organization »;

– The fact that this announcement was widely known about her, as well as that RTS in « diary » would not evacuate (commentary Tatjana Lenard, in Budapest, who followed the household Saba, to call her husband, also workers Televisions, not to enter the building that night).

2. The Serbian State Vrh at least is the effectist of the liquidation of RTS technicians) by as much as two reasons, the Federal Government was ordered. Order on activating the notice measures and, II and III of the 1994 law, an emergency evacuation of RTS to one of the so-called. spare places of work.

The army, which was responsible for execution, and the Serb civilian authorities, meant to be, which means that both of these authorities would be responsible for the crime and that they did not know about the impending attack; b) and the military (general stab) and Serbian authorities were warned in aimed day, which there is a huge number of official evidence, many of whom were seduced in court writings and described in Zoran Janić’s book « Silence in Aberdareva ».

For example, the Ministry of Defense Lieutenant Lakić Djorović, as a competent official of the Ministry of Defense, has officially filed in the Special Prosecutor’s Office, that the military knew about the attack, recent NATO communication (which the Ministry of Defense kept or preserves material evidence. Or that a member of the General Staff was made by Colonel Dušan Vojvodić from RTS for several hours before the attack, and that she signaled his colleagues about what it was about.

Then the testimony of CNN journalists Alesija Vinci that they were warned about the attack and that they were a few hours before informing the Management Board (director Dragoljub Milanović). Then a public recognition of the director of « Hadži Struja Struja » policies that both RTS attack was announced (so that it was recorded from the nearby building of a new home) and many, many others.

3. When the families of the Defense Ministry of Dossiers (467/2001) in which it guarded the number of files, Minister Dragan Sutanovac (at the meeting on which the minister, under which the table was listed), and then he denied him.

The legal representative of the Family Srdji Popović, who came to execute, the official said, « Of course we knew, but we can’t give you a file. »

4. The Special Prosecutor’s Office for Organized Crime, which in 2009 were new evidence, they considered the evidence of the official investigation (from the top of civilian and military authorities), but advertised the subject of several public prosecutor’s office in Belgrade, which « frozen » without a valid explanation « froze » without a valid explanation The investigation (which is the procedure unknown right), allegedly « Losing » evidence was collected by the Special Prosecutor for Organized Crime.

The Supreme Public Prosecutor Zagorka Dolovac has promised the families of the victims twice, through his deputies (she did not appear at meetings alone), that the investigation would start from the dead point, but it was nothing.

5. Aleksandar Vučić, which was reported by the Minister of Information and Member of RTS in the capacity to investigate the murder of journalists in the capacity of the First Vice-President, in the capacity to investigate the victims and an associate member of the Miroslav Bojčić Commission, as soon as he set Specific issues in the direction of a detailed investigation into the role of military state security in victimizing RTS technicians.

Thus the whole subject 2014. Put ad acta.

Sacrificing of 16 RTS technicians in 1999. was the first marketing crime of civilian and military authorities in Serbia, in which victims were not citizens of other nationalities. Although NATO has taken the attack, allowing it to the very least informed of the attack, the domestic authority, which has been violating the Evacuation of Television, which entered into force with the declaration of war, IB) when they have already learned about attack, There are non-complicated material evidence and are numerous relevant, mutually consent with the competent officials and insaders, the military and Milosevic’s cliquis have sent people in a safe death, and it works in essentially insignificant target: possible advantages in propaganda war.

On that occasion, it could have become clearly the complete absence of any interest in the power to suffer from the population of Serbia, those Orthodox or Muslims, Serbs or Albanians or anyone else; It was not people for power, but human materials.

In addition to a short break during Zoran Djindjic, Serbian authorities continued with criminals, now by destroying the conditions for normal life through industrial pollution, and the end result was 16 people under the canopy of Novi Sad railway station.

This death with RTS technician does not only connect the number of victims (16), nor the same way of concrete, contained in the fact that the Minister of Information and the Member of the RTS, and thus in the least formally responsible for respecting the certification of the television evacuation order at the least sure.

The two events connects the judicial outcome: only a war director of RTS Dragan Milanović, who consciously attracted all the guilt upon himself at the very beginning of the investigative proceedings, allowing orders to get out.

In the case of the Novi Sad crime, for now, the accused mostly designers and engineers, not the company through which most of which is extracted mostly inflated revenues from reconstruction, nor ministers and superior planners of the corruption scheme. Both crimes are, of course, followed by a deafening propaganda trajectory, hiding key documents and clamps.

The author is a long-term representative and assistant families of victims of RTS bombing in the Commission for Research of Journalists

The author’s attitudes in the dialogue not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Danas.