juin 2, 2025
Home » The monitoring of the crumbs

The monitoring of the crumbs

The monitoring of the crumbs


Guðni Á. Haraldsson Attorney General Says the surveillance of local construction representatives with new buildings is very lacking. This must be remedied, as poor monitoring can have serious consequences.

Guðni was a lawyer in a case that was told in Morgunblaðið yesterday. Specifically, a court case was reported on deficiencies in the apartment building at Långlína 2-6 in the Zealand district in Gardabaer. But in that case (No. 798/2017), the Supreme Court of Arion Bank ruled to pay the housing company about 300 million in compensation, but all the coverings of the block had to be demolished and re -dressed for about ISK 460 million.

Put their men on the command

Gudni says he was asked Arion Bank on the basis of shadow management.

« The bank took over the building after the collapse and took over the construction company. It put its men on the board. Built as cheaply as he could. Sold the apartments and paid in on the company’s loan with the bank and then put the construction company into bankruptcy. So when these big disadvantages came to light, the bank said: But he didn’t get away with it, ”he says

Guðni says it is straightforward as one resident of Longline said in a conversation with Morgunblaðið that insurance for new buildings needs to be reviewed.

« Then there is the supervision of the municipal construction representative in the mug, » says Guðni. « They do not put any money into the supervision. Building managers and masters in the houses should have a lot of responsibility but it is really very limited. I have had many such issues and in them often comes the fact that the masters of the houses have never really come close to their construction. »

Damage to new construction.

mbl.is/baldur

Belong

Who are not standing?

« The construction officials of the municipalities should be monitored that the audits are carried out. They should ensure that the other audits are carried out and they should not issue a final certificate until it is clear that all the audits have been carried out and people should not move into the houses before it takes place. This is why the monitoring has been extremely poor. It states which phase audits need to be carried out at any given time in the construction of houses.

Completely out of the hat

« The building managers’ insurance is another matter and that there is one guarantee for one multi -tenant house. It is completely out of the question and the ministries in question have been pointed out many times, but they do nothing about it. This needs to be corrected.

The various building managers are registered, but with new construction laws from 2012, the construction manager’s responsibility was sharpened. It should be a building manager for each house and he should make sure that masters conduct audits on the other and these aspects. There is a disadvantage that this will happen. Sorry.

Do not attend in withdrawals

There are the various masters on the houses that never come close to their construction, even do not attend the audits. Do not show up and then no audit is carried out. This is therefore very ridiculous. The responsibility of the building manager to the building manager was being transferred. That system has not been successful. Unfortunately, ”Guðni concludes.

Get a subscription to read on

You are in regulated that But do not subscribe.

Access to this full -length article requires a subscription to Morgunblaðið, electronic access such as a weekly pass or a special subscription to the relevant content category on mbl.is.



View Original Source