The judgment surprised even those who saw everything

Where to park a car is important for both apartment residents and businesses. When the local are busy, it is not limited to barns or the police – the situation in Kaunas also needed courts.

« For the last five years, the residents of the house have sufficiently sufficient: they had additional legal costs every month and were hindered by access to the site, » said Giedrius Šatkauskas, chairman of the house community.

There are about 90 in the house. According to the lawyer, the residents were stated that the site was private. However, if you want to use, you can, but a small part and paid.

« Two raised barriers have emerged, with numbers scanning systems and purpose, » said G. Šatkauskas.

« The legal entity, since it is his property, took the position that it is my property and I can do what I want, » explained lawyer Aris Damušis.

LNK stop shot.

The issue of the site fell to the Supreme Court, which announced that the business could not behave as he wants in this case.

« It cannot be the case that someone registers with his own name as an independent structure, and the owners of the apartment who know how to use the rent, are losing the right to use it, » said Judge Algirdas Taminskas of the Supreme Court of Lithuania.

In short, the residents of the house have the right to use a yard parking lot belonging to another.

However, the leader of investment real estate project development also responded to such a wording of the court. What does the interpretation mean not to the case, but to other owners and drivers of the site?

« This is a precedent. If there is a Supreme Court decision, they are formed by practice. Based on this solution, such legal provisions may be applied and all other cases may be.

The judge tries to explain that the decomposition does not mean a coup or the fact that parking will now be available to a neighbor’s location.

« The private limited liability company, which was involved in the case as a plaintiff, registered title as an independent object, as if the site was not related to the house. For those who have purchased specific places, others cannot use them, » said A. Taminskas.

On the other side, the lawyer said the final judgment was unpleasantly surprised. According to the company, the interpretations provided by the court are, in principle, contrary to the constitutional principle of inviolability of property.

Full LNK Report – In Video:

And parking is not just about Kaunas.

« There is no shortage of complaints, the drivers’ culture has not changed: how they wanted to come to the door, so do Tebenori, » said the chief of the Vilnius Public Order Group. Advisor Gintaras Leperskas.

What if you see your place when you return home? The police can only help.

« Officials can provide assistance to the citizen by determining the owner of a carrier car and informing them to pull, but these are not violations of the KET, » said Tomas Bražėnas, a representative of Vilnius police.

And the advice of the municipality is:

« This is your private location, you are your assets and care, » advised the chief of the Vilnius Public Order Group. Advisor.

Police note that a private parking space must be properly marked. Those who are invalid, educated and so – cars are simply pulled.

« We do not impress from the yards because there is no conditions that are hindered by traffic, » explained G. Leperskas.

Consequently, the car can only be removed from common use, but not private courts.