The judgment of the Tampere statue thieves hardened at the court
Judgments|The judgment of Lauri Viida’s monument and two other men who destroyed the statues intensified in the Court of Appeal. The two -year imprisonment sentenced to two and a half years.
The abstract is made by artificial intelligence and checked by man.
The Turku Court of Appeal increased the judgment of three men who destroyed three statues in Tampere and Lappeenranta.
The two -year imprisonment sentence was extended to two and a half years.
The Court of Appeal considered that the acts had violated the historically and culturally important values of the works.
Turku The Court of Appeal has raised a total of three men who have exported and destroyed in Tampere and Lappeenranta.
In October 2023, the men destroyed the men in Pyyniki in Tampere Lauri Viida Memorial, From the concrete milling poetry wings –the work of the work as well as in Nekala Fishingstatue.
Later revealed that Porridge-The disappearance of the statue from the old Lappeenranta hospital area was related to the whole.
In March 2024, the Pirkanmaa District Court sentenced the men to two -year imprisonment and extensive compensation of more than € 250,000 for two gross thefts and two thefts.
For the City of Tampere, the duo will have to reimburse a total of EUR 202,000 for works and over a thousand euros of legal costs. The owner of the Tiura hospital area from Lappeenranta was paid more than EUR 55,000 for repair and other costs.
Judgment The Saints appealed to the Court of Appeal. The convicts demand that the penalties be shortened and condemned as conditional.
The Court of Appeal issued its decision on April 3. The court shows that the Court of Appeal has intensified the punishments of both men.
In addition to two thefts and two gross thefts, the Court of Appeal considered that the men were guilty of two serious damage and increased imprisonment for two years and six months.
In addition to two thefts and two gross thefts, the Court of Appeal considered that the men were guilty of two serious damage and increased imprisonment for two years and six months. Jarkko Joonas Liukkonen33, and Joel Mikael Samuli Tolonen34, judgments are absolute.
According to the Court of Appeal, the criterion for aggravating the punishment may be that the act was the subject of works that have historically and culturally important values. The court held that the crimes were a significant violation of these values. For this reason, the Court of Appeal also condemned the perpetrators for gross damage.
