The judge, about the afforeation of the Extremaduran socialist leader: « It is law fraud » | Spain

Beatriz Biedma, the judge of Badajoz who investigates David Sánchez, brother of the president of the Government; to the leader of the PSOE of Extremadura, Miguel Ángel Gallardo, and nine other people accused of the crimes of administrative prevarication and influence peddling for the alleged irregularities in The hiring of the first in 2017 and of An extrabajador of the Moncloa Palace In the Diputación de Badajoz – after a complaint of the Ultra Organization, be heard and Vox in 2024 – He has sent a reasoned exhibition – a document where the arguments of the case, in the opinion of the magistrate – against the socialist Gallardo – on Monday. Judge Biedma considers that Gallardo’s aforement of a few weeks ago is a « law fraud. »

This decision, advanced by the newspaper The confidential Already the one that has also had access to the country, is a consequence of the last political movement of the Extremadura socialist leader. Gallardo was until a few days President of the Diputación de Badajoz. That is, his case was going to be deliberate by a Criminal Court in Badajoz by not being a regional deputy and, therefore, not being clustered. But, in a movement promoted by the party and he himself, he decided to make the leap to the Assembly of Extremadura, where he had to resign a deputy and three more who were on the list. Now, Gallardo, who is already formally deputy in the Autonomous Parliament, does become aggroced.

This implies that, in case of being accused of one or more crimes, as is the case, they will be tried by a different court that would judge them to common citizens: the Superior Court of Justice of Extremadura. Sources from the socialist leader’s environment are surprised with this movement of the magistrate, which calls into question: « It is clear that it is part of the structure of PP and Vox. »

Judge Biedma writes in her reasoned exhibition of 102 pages that Gallardo’s aforement is a « law fraud. » And speaks of a « maneuver » of the regional leader. « It seems to be, » writes the magistrate, « who at the current historical moment has been forgotten, but any person who occupies a public position should serve to the general interest and put this on any personal interest, and this is what legitimizes it in the exercise of their functions. Now, more than ever, and given the social reality that surrounds us, the descriptions of classical philosophy- foundation of the configuration of the configuration of the configuration of the configuration of the configuration of the configuration of the configuration of the configuration of the configuration of the configuration of the configuration. Modern work the « good ruler », whose behavior must be exemplary and always put the public interest to your own.  »

The brief also indicates that « the relevant » is not the time when the agora has been acquired, « but the way in which it took place and the purpose sought with it. »

Gallardo’s movement has generated internal criticism in the PSOE Extremaduran and national. His jump to the camera is produced by an express request of the party, according to several of them. « We all told him to face, » said the mayor of Mérida, Antonio Rodríguez Osuna, one of the most faithful to Gallardo in the region, a few weeks ago. « We saw that the judicial case was dilated … it may sound rare, in the sense that one thing said and has done another. But the times of the PSOE are not the times of justice. » The reality is that Gallardo also said that he was not going to go to the assembly to be agreed and has done the opposite.

Now, after this writing of Magistrate Biedma, it will be the Superior Court of Justice of Extremadura who must make a decision on this procedure. « Affaration does not mean immunity or impunity, » Gallardo said a few weeks ago. The newspaper Today from Extremadura This Sunday, who would be the magistrates who will judge Gallardo, in the case of the TSJ finally assume the cause. This is María Félix Tena, Manuela Eslava and Antonio María González Floriano. All, of long experience. One entered the Court by seniority, another was proposed by the Assembly of Extremadura and the third was elected by the General Council of the Judiciary.