The JCCJ has been involved in partisan and irregular
lawyer Adrian Toni Neacşu. former judge, noted on Friday the speed with which has been judged to the supreme court The appeals to the sentence of the Ploiești Court of Appeal, by which the tour was practically played.Before ICCJ was pronounced, Neacşu opted that the rapid motivation of the sentence by the judge appointed in Ploiești and the integrated establishment of a court term at the JCCJ shows that « the pressures exercised were terrible ».
”ICCJ is involved in partisan and irregular to cancel the sentence of the Ploiești Court of Appeal.
The sentence was given yesterday, today (Friday – no.) Was motivated, and the judge appointed to Ploiești was wrong when the term of 5 days of appeal passed for both solutions, respectively the suspension of the decision 32/2024 of the CCR.
In fact, the term of 5 days of appeal from the ruling is only for the disposition regarding the suspension.
For the file fund, the annulment, the legal term of appeal is 15 days from the communication of the motivated sentence.
The file was not resolved according to the special procedure of the electoral appeals but as an ordinary administrative litigation.
Normally a file cannot leave the appeal before expiring the term of the appeal for all parties involved.
The rapid motivation of the sentence by the judge appointed in Ploiești and the integrated establishment of a court term at the ICCJ shows that the pressures exerted were terrible. I do not say that from the outside, they can also be from the inside of the ICCJ, who wants to put an end to the render as possible from CA Ploiești.
The ICCJ solution should normally be given only in terms of suspension, but no matter how the solution is predictable: the form beats the fund. The ICCJ will cancel the decision or only the disposition regarding the suspension with the simple legal argument and confirmed in tens or hundreds of previous solutions that the CCR decisions cannot be the subject of the administrative litigation, ”the lawyer wrote on his Facebook page.
The ICCJ rejected the requests for suspension, respectively annulment of the decision of the Constitutional Court 32 of December 6, 2024, practically annulled on Thursday of the Ploiesti Court of Appeal.
