The “Isias Hotel” knot will be solved in Ankara: appeal, last step before the ECHR – Cyprus Newspaper

Champion Angels Survival Association, Isias Hotel Case Adiyaman 3rd High Criminal Court against the decision against the decision against the decision of appeal after the rejection of the Supreme Court announced.

While the Supreme Court of Appeals in Ankara is expected to be long, the appeal for the association of the champion angels will be the last step before the European Court of Human Rights.

Ruşen Yücesoylu Karakaya, President of the Association of Champion Angels who lost their daughters Selin and Serin at İsias Hotel, and Pervin Aksoy İpekçioğlu Professor of Law Professor, answered the questions of Tak correspondent.

İpekçioğlu: « Their families are again waiting for a long and challenging process »

Pervin Aksoy İpekçioğlu stated that after the rejection of the appeal application, the Supreme Court of Appeals will go to the Supreme Court, that there were two weeks of application periods for the appeal, that this period has begun and the appeal was the last step of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR).

Ipekcioglu, « We have two weeks from the date of notification. The time has begun. The Supreme Court will go to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court will be in Ankara. The duration of the case will be long. Families are waiting for a long and challenging process again. » he said.

Ipekcioglu will be sent to the 16th Gaziantep Regional Court of Justice (BAM). İpekçioğlu, « The petition is expected to be sent to the relevant criminal department of the Supreme Court of Appeals. The Supreme Court of Appeals should decide to break the Criminal Chamber and submit a justification according to the concrete event. » He said.

« In case of exhaustion of domestic law, the ECtHR »

Ipekcioglu, Adiyaman 3rd High Criminal Court, the decision of the decision of the decision of the appeal of the decision, the decision will continue to fight in the event of deterioration, if the depletion of domestic law will apply to the ECtHR said.

Ipekçioğlu, who criticized the fact that the Isias Hotel case is not combined with the public officials case, said, ıştır It is the Adıyaman Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office, which prepares the ground for not combining the cases. ” he said.

İpekçioğlu “The process of receiving expression in the preparation of the indictment for the public officials was consciously left after the decision in the first case. In this way, the two cases were different and there was no benefit for the merger. However, the unification of the two cases would reveal the whole of the painting and the way of realization of the event.” He said.

Karakaya: « They stole the future of our children »

Champion Angels Association President Ruşen Yücesoylu Karakaya, families have been struggling to not lose the hope of a huge struggle by expressing, « Families this struggle is added every day. This struggle given, not only against justice, we are struggling to cope with our pain. » he said.

Despite everything, they are together, trying to survive and continue to fight Karakaya said, « Our children stole the future of our children. But as an association for children, for future generations. The association’s school project is progressing confidently, the work has begun. » He said.

« They will not wash us, intimidate us… The case is not over yet”

“They will not wash us, they will not intimidate us, Karak said Karakaya, pointing out that the families of tourist guides have strengthened from them, stressed that they are together as families.

Adıyaman 3rd High Criminal Court in the case of Isias Hotel in the case of Prime Minister Ünal Üsel, the state and government officials with the Union of Bar Associations with the Union of Karakaya noted that Karakaya, after the hearing, the authorities gave a message of solidarity and solidarity. Karakaya, the public officials in the case of the unity message, but the first case of solidarity in the first case, he said.

Stating that the society thinks that the case is over, Karakaya said, “This case is not over yet. Families are waiting for the support of the whole society.” he said.

Karakaya, on July 16, the second hearing of the case of public officials said they want to see all the authorities with them.

Isias Hotel Case Process…

During the earthquake of 7.7 and 7.6 in Kahramanmaraş, which took place on February 6, 2023 in Türkiye, the Turkish Cypriots, teachers and families from the volleyball group of the Gazimağusa, who stayed at the Grand Isias Hotel in Adıyaman, lost their lives under the debris.

The legal struggle launched on January 3, 2024 for 72 Can, who lost his life in İsias Hotel and the families of 10 wounded and the families of 10 wounded on 3 January 2024 continued for 12 months.

Despite the struggle for justice to convince the defendants on the crime of “possible caste”, the 3rd High Criminal Court was discussed in the last hearing of the Isias Hotel case on December 25, 2024, and the five defendants were acquitted for the death and injury of more than one person.

Ahmet Bozkurt 17 years 17 months 7 days, Mehmet Fatih Bozkurt 15 years 28 months 28 days, Erdem Yıldız 17 years 17 months 7 days, Halil Bağcı 7 years and 16 months, Hasan Aslan 15 years and 16 months 20 days, Mehmet Göncüoğlu was sentenced to imprisonment for 7 years and 16 months. Bilge Açık, Efe Bozkurt, Seda Zeren, Şule Özbek and Ulviye Bozkurt were acquitted.

After the announcement of the reasoned decision of the Isias Hotel case on January 20, the application for appeal was rejected on Thursday (May 29th).

On the other hand, the case of public officials who had a defect in the collapse of Adıyaman Grand Isias Hotel started to be discussed in the Adıyaman 1st Criminal Court on 24 April and the hearing was postponed to July 16th. In the case, the demands of the defendants were rejected and the defendants were present at the hearing and the continuation of the judicial control conditions.

Adıyaman 3rd High Criminal Court was not accepted on the grounds that the appeal process was not accepted on the grounds of the appeal, and the court decided to expect an expert report from Dokuz Eylül University for the determination of the flaws of public officials.