The court overturned the firing of guards in prison
Riihimäki|The guards drank alcohol during working hours on New Year’s Eve, which led to their redundancies. The court now decided to cancel the firing.
The abstract is made by artificial intelligence and checked by man.
The Hämeenlinna Administrative Court has overturned the redundancies of five Riihimäki prison guards.
The guards had been dismissed in 2023 because they drank alcohol during working hours on New Year’s Eve.
The Criminal Sanctions Agency is considering complaining about the decision to the Supreme Administrative Court.
Hämeenlinna The Administrative Court has overturned the dismissal of five guards of Riihimäki Prison. The Criminal Sanctions Agency announced on Friday.
The Criminal Sanctions Agency had dismissed officials who worked in supervisory duties in 2023. The reason for the dismissal was inappropriate behavior, serious neglect of official duties and a serious jeopardy of institutional safety.
« It has been revealed that during the New Year’s evening, five guards have brought alcohol at office in the office, » the unit manager of the then Riihimäki Prison Tomi Tuovinen Said Helsingin Sanomat in May 2023.
« In addition, serious negligence in other official duties have occurred. They would have been able to endanger plant safety in terms of the safety of prisoners and other staff if, for example, a fire or other special situation had come. »
Because of the events, the employer said he had lost his confidence in five officials.
According to the Criminal Sanctions Agency, the acts had been able to jeopardize not only prison safety but also general trust in the authority.
Criminal According to Friday’s announcement, the activities of these guards have been reprehensible and jeopardizing prison safety, so it has been necessary to deal with civil service.
The Criminal Sanctions Agency now says that it will explore the decisions of the Administrative Court, which overturned the redundancies.
The plant will then decide whether to complain about the decisions to the Supreme Administrative Court.
