The Court of Appeal passed on to a young school column jail
Ylitornio|The Court of Appeal raised the penalty, which now became absolute imprisonment.
The abstract is made by artificial intelligence and checked by man.
The Rovaniemi Court of Appeal sentenced a boy who raped a boy at school to two years and three months in imprisonment.
At the time of the work, a 16-year-old boy raped a 13-year-old girl Ylitornio’s Ainiovaara School Center in December 2023.
The Court of Appeal raised the conditional judgment of the District Court, as the acts took place at school and caused considerable mental consequences for the victim.
At the age of thirteen The boy who raped at the girl’s school is in prison as the Rovaniemi Court of Appeal raised his imprisonment for two years and three months. Thus, punishment is absolute imprisonment.
The judgment of the Court of Appeal on Thursday changed the sentence substantially, as in the past the district court reached the boy’s conditional judgment of one year and ten months.
The verdict came from a young person for childbearing and sexual interference with the child.
At the time of the act, a 16-year-old boy raped the girl Ylitornio Ainiovaara School Center during the school day in December 2023.
HS does not publish the name of the convict despite the absolute judgment because he was a minor.
Court of Appeal He stated that the boy had had sexual intercourse with the victim using violence and touched him.
The Court of Appeal now noted that the acts had happened at school, that is, in a place where the victim had repeatedly returned to.
According to the court, the work had significant psychological consequences for the girl. The judgment would have been at least three years if the author had been of legal age.
To the Court of Appeal complained about all parties. The author argued that he had anxiety and negative reactions and threats against him after the crime.
The Court of Appeal stated that such a punishment would not alleviate the punishment. Regular or anticipated harmful consequences resulting from the offender or due to the judgment do not justify mitigating the punishment.
« Now In this case, the defendant had not appeared to the defendant abnormal consequences of the crime or judgment that would lead to his unreasonable or exceptionally harmful outcome, ”it said.
The Court of Appeal’s judgment differs from the District Court’s judgment, in particular in that the Court of Appeal now considered that there are complicated reasons for imprisoning a minor in imprisonment. The district court did not see this. It also notes that the author has no previous convictions for crimes or, according to the report, a criminal attitude.
The court ordered the author to pay different compensation of a total of a few tens of thousands. The suffering allowance was EUR 11,000, a mental disorder of EUR 6,000 and pain and pain of EUR 500.
He will have to pay at least about EUR 7,000. In addition to these, he will have to reimburse a few thousand different costs accrued to the victim.
