The break is nearing the end – Personal views

Like many other Latin Sentences and this is very current today, as if nothing has changed in the meantime. One of the fresh examples of turning into caricature is the one when the television pink, brutal imitation of the « impression of the week » made its « hit-twit » show, war criminals and similar caricatures of political life. Simply, the authors and the show, do not quit to deal with journalism.

That the desire to imitate escalates continued on a recent parliament entitled « Do not give Serbia », which, in order to be a copy of a large population of 15. Marta, turns out his cartoon.

That, of course, was inevitable because, as it was said, what a valisted Jupiter is not suitable. The opposition, understood in the broadest sense, not only as a political parties, is allowed to organize mass demonstrations, rally and street protests, because it has no other way to force the authority to consider her attitudes seriously. In contrast, the government has a whole appliance and coercion and she, in principle, can do everything to her, as the current government in Serbia does, and is meaningless to protest something, at least against the opposition.

The fact that Aleksandar Vučić, despite the clear difference in the position of government and the opposition, resorted to the making of countermating and protests, shows, among other things, its total misunderstanding of political and social life in Serbia. It is obvious that he understands the policy as a conflict of fan groups in which it is important to have more followers than an opponent. And the paroles under which the parliament was held from 12. April indicate that there are serious cognitive disorders in the perception of the current government on Serbian society. Because, hysterical slogans « Don’t give Serbia » and « will not destroy Serbia » means that Serbia is in the default war and that the opposition wants to destroy Serbia as the state. Such a dramatic accusation at the account of the opposition by the authorities have never heard in any modern state so far, because something would be meaningless. Excepting the Austrian Nazis and their action to Anšlus in 1938. years, as well as the « Lithium » movement in Montenegro, which is up to 2020. Bio opposition, there is no example that some opposition worked on the destruction of their own state. The legitimate ambition of the opposition is to conquer power, not to demolish the state in which he lives, so that the Prosecution of Demanding State shows an estimating person to identify his own person with the state.

In this context, the question is what are the political and social effects of the Parliament from 12 April? It is quite certain that its maintenance was to emphasize the differences between the two parts of society and that he had led to the incomentionality. If it was an intention to Aleksandar Vučić, then he did it completely.

To make the previous orientation of the authorities will change and form a new government whose evident is the main task to allow additional purchase of time. Moreover, it would be said that this government is a step back, if it is judged by hard attitudes about the burning questions for Serbia and according to the fact that extreme nationalists are involved in the government, Vuka Stanković, Starović, Popović and others. After all, in the Serbian advanced party, it was said that it is a government of continuity that they will support while the policy of Aleksandar Vučić is followed. Hence the call of the new prime minister acts, regardless of his personal predispositions, as a flue curtain because it is clear that the content and framework of that « dialogue » will determine Vučić, which means that there is nothing from dialogue. It is about to pull, as personalities, dialogue does not even occur, nor does he understand what dialogue in fact means. It is a militant character and as a politician formed in times of conflict, confrontation and intolerance, so it is an atmosphere in which it is best managed.

Everything, therefore, suggests that social opposites will continue to strain, with a untried desire that the opposition applies the more radical methods, which would create an excuse to perform violent calculation with it.

Anyway, the breakup is closer to the end.

The author is a social activist

The author’s attitudes in the dialogue not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Danas.