Starting the process from an anonymous letter. Why should Olsi a nanny definitely stay in this matter?
The group of lawyers in the case of the mayor of Tirana, Erion Veliaj, describes the start of the process against him based on an anonymous letter. In a meeting with journalists, the lawyers described this process an abusive practice, while stressing that in the present case no conditions were met to launch an investigation, as there is neither report nor event.
« The start of the process from an anonymous we consider it as an illegal precedent. This process has begun through a vetting made to Mr. Veliaj for a period of 20 years. Compared to the practice of investigating such a character, this has not happened in any other matter. For this we deduce that it is an abusive practice, also linking it to the anonymity, which has filed the report, because it is understood that the prosecution body, as a proceeding body, as the sole authority of investigating and bringing the case to court, acts on a report or on an event. In the present case we do not find an event. We do not even find a report of a injured person, or otherwise of a « certain victim », « Lawyer Max Haxhia said.
Another problem that is valued by lawyers is the deliberate dissemination of the information truncated in the media. « I want to let you know that the information given to the public on all this issue, we find that there is shortcomings and the information is incomplete. Certain passages of episodes, which are subject to investigation and are fixed by the prosecution body on the material on which the court imposed the security measure « Prison Arrest » for Mr. Veliaj and other measures for all participants, have been given to the public. the lawyer said.
Veliaj's lawyers have openly expressed their indignation over the failure to return a response from the High Inspectorate of Justice and the High Prosecutorial Council, which must expressed a complaint to them by Mayor Erion Veliaj a few days ago, to exclude prosecutor Ols Dado, who is in the conflict of interest.
“I am indignant by ILD and the KLP because they are in complete inactivity. The first work, the requirements you should not only respond in real time, but you are an institution you pay, you have your instruments, you have human capacity, and you have to exercise control. No longer when you are aware of a person who is the mayor. When you are thought to have been not put in motion by the mayor, who is arrested, what will happen to us others? Therefore, if justice has a negative bill, it is also the responsibility of these institutions ”, Lawyer Max Haxhia said, in a meeting with journalists.
They have shed light on another important point, such as prosecutor Ols Dado's claim that Mayor Veliaj has intimidated the BKH agent with SMS. Veliaj's lawyer, Ermir Beta, explained in the meeting with journalists that the content of SMS has nothing intimidating.
“There is no talk of intimidation for judges who are super trained and paid. There is no talk of an intimidation of an investigator who, the next day, or a few days later, enters the mayor's office to obtain whatever documents he found necessary. It is not an intimidating. What is the context? The context is that Mr. Veliaj, even at the time when Ms. Xoxa in December 2024, has been on a job overseas. He was found in the situation that his wife, his wife, has been controlled. It's a thing that doesn't happen daily and causes a shock.
Mrs. Xoxa was called and asked for about 9-10 hours as a person who knows, but in December 2024. Of course, it is a process that is not very easy for people who are not used to knocking on that building to enter and be subject to questions. It has happened that one of the investigators who interrogated him a few days ago has found it necessary to ask Mrs. Xoxa for the facts that he judged necessary and necessary. And he made a communication over the phone, with Watsup or SMS, where he was asked Saturday to be called to the SPAK to make some additional statements. It turns out that even on that day Mr. Veliaj has been traveling overseas and they live alone, all three, along with their minor son.
Imagine now, to be with children, you have been called before and gave evidence of 9 or 10 hours for all your life and Saturday to think you will stop receiving a call from a BKH officer who says come again, experience that situation once again. First, the spouse is not. Second, the child with whom will he stay? Naturally, to convey this situation to your spouse who is not near you, he is on a journey overseas, is far away, which creates a perception of his situation. And in the text I have, but that we cannot make available, there is nothing intimidating ”, tEat lawyer beta.
