Skomina: Justifiably canceled by Rakitic’s goal, is the same action. Neither would I judge a penalty on Kalik
River was kicking in Koprivnica, Dynamo in Varaždin. In the 27th round HNL The only one celebrated Hajduk And that naked Ivan Rakitic that brilliantly made with a free kick knocked down Šibenik.
The fight for the top is thick that there can be no density, and no less intense and dramatic is not even for Europe. The judicial decisions and misses of this round were commented by a former elite judge Damir Skina In the show « Tportal Judge Analysis » on MaxSport.
Lokomotiva – Gorica 1-1, Judge: Dario Bel
01:41
NK Lokomotiva Zagreb VS HNK Gorica 1: 1
All matches of the HNL Supersport HNL only look at MaxSport channel of Croatian Telecom.
39 minutes, penal – He played with his foot first, not by hand, and you can see the tread. The guidance of the judges for clear treads should be judged. When something is minimal then no, but this was clear and purely and very good for intervention. The judge watches on the other hand, which is why he did not see. The correct decision.
49. Minutes, undone the SMAKAJA goal – It is under the jurisdiction of an auxiliary judge who was too concentrated on the situation in the sixester. And he dropped his most recent part, which is to watch if he crosses the ball to the line. Thank God we have a var and it is clear that it is. There is no offense over Banic, but there was contact with his teammate. If the ball hadn’t got out of the goal, it would have been regulating.
86 minutes, Kolar’s goal, undone for the hinterland – We don’t even need lines, clearly a pure hinterland can be seen.
Istria – Osijek 2-1, Judge: Duje Strukan
01:31
Summary Istria 1961 – Osijek
All matches of the HNL Supersport HNL only look at MaxSport channel of Croatian Telecom.
4 minutes, Justice hit Marešić’s fist? – You can see that the palm is open, the judge has no angle. That he saw can be talked about yellow and nothing more than that. It is more that he wants to push him away from himself, does not use his hand as a weapon and we can only talk about yellow. This is where VAR does not turn on because it is a yellow card.
75 minutes – The judge is well set up, but does not recognize an obvious offense. It has to be a yellow card because it’s a tread that is very painful. There must be an offense and a yellow card.
92. Minutes, air duel, Mauric subsequently grabbed the ball in his hands, Pusic’s yellow card, then drops naked – The offense itself does not look controversial because the Istria player gets a shot with his head in the nape. Maybe Duje was insecure for a moment and didn’t show clearly, so it would be clearer to everyone. So Pusic probably gave him something and he probably got two yellow cards for complaints. There was no judge’s whistle and Mauric puts the ball into his hands? It doesn’t matter, he later gives off the offense, and just that he received her in his hand does not have to be a yellow card, they expected, but he could say « it is not an offense for me, the hand is punishable and the ball is for Osijek. » It doesn’t have to be a yellow card. Yellow could be that some promising action was interrupted, this is not the case.
Slaven – Rijeka 2-1, Judge: Mateo Erceg
01:41
Summary Slaven Belupo – Rijeka
All matches of the HNL Supersport HNL only look at MaxSport channel of Croatian Telecom.
19 minutes, starting Ćubelić over Čop, yellow Ćubelić – If he hit him, and I believe he’s in a digger, then it’s a yellow card. As soon as it goes up where it is hidden, I would say it is a starting starter and has to be red. I am more about the impression that it is a shot of John with Kopačka, which is why it is enough for me a yellow card.
68. Minutes, menale yellow for simulating. Penalty? – I am certainly not for a penalty kick because when he stands with his foot no longer does an additional movement. Nor am I at one hundred percent that it’s yellow for menale. Judge Erceg saw that he wanted to cheat on him and wanted to make contact. The player when he feels that he is not an offense over him, he will not receive this situation so easily. I know Menal from Olympia, and there he knew how to potentiate things. But every situation should be watched separately. I’m not sure I would give him yellow, but not even playing a penalty.
Hajduk – Šibenik 1-0, Judge: Ante Čulina
01:42
Summary Hajduk – Sibenik
All matches of the HNL Supersport HNL only look at MaxSport channel of Croatian Telecom.
24th minute, penalty and free kick for Hajduk, hand of a flower – You can see that the flower is almost half a meter with the foot with which it reflects outside. So there is no talk of a penalty kick and I believe they also watched the corner from another camera in Var room. Perhaps the central one showing clearer. She is playing her hand, has left her a lot to prevent the center with the center.
41 minutes, a foul over Brajkovic, the game released, an opportunity for Sibenik was born – I am impressed that it is a misdemeanor. Sibenik’s player goes to the ball, but he really goes with too much force and to happen in the penalty area, that start goes to the yellow, so he could be a penalty. The best decision here is to play a free kick for Hajduk.
57. Minutes, red flower, crashed Russian – It is a Hajduk player who broke out alone in front of the goalkeeper. Cvek at that speed, a pulling a lot that it is a little impossible for you. Clear red card. Very important that Hajduk player has a ball under control, that’s very important. It has it and it’s red.
67. Minutes, canceled naked rakitic goal – For me, this is all the same action, and when the ball is rejected is still the same action. Sibenik would have to come to a clear controlled estate, that is, if the ball broke out towards the center and that a new action was moving. It is a very minor hinterland, but the referee marked where the most prominent player of Sibenik was and the red line was drawn in front of the Blue. As little as it is, it’s enough. That the lines are over each other then the advantage of the attacker. It must really be for the ball to go to the center and to go again to be a new action. Or a clear possession of a rival team.
83. Minutes, Čulina refused the VAR intervention, a penalty penalty? – I would not agree with these shots that he was a penalty. We have an impression, but not clear proof. Var, when he calls you, has to give you a product, a clear proof where that contact is. We don’t see him here. It was crossed from three, four angles, no clear blow to the leg of Kalika could not be seen. Neither would I opt for the VAR suggestion. In my opinion, the VAR intervention was unnecessary.
Varaždin – Dinamo 1-1, Judge: Patrik Kolarić
01:29
Summary Varaždin – Dinamo
All matches of the HNL Supersport HNL only look at MaxSport channel of Croatian Telecom.
81 minutes, penalty for Dinamo after Duel Petkovic and Marine – The recording is not the best, but the reaction of the Varazdin player is clear. Who only turned in the other direction after playing and left the action. He definitely hits him on the leg and is aware of what he did. Absolutely a penalty kick.
/s3/static.nrc.nl/images/gn4/stripped/data88311411-7b1b2a.jpg|https://images.nrc.nl/ewKoS-W6QwX8Q9FTF-9XPxxkLJA=/1920x/filters:no_upscale()/s3/static.nrc.nl/images/gn4/stripped/data88311411-7b1b2a.jpg|https://images.nrc.nl/GlOhTMQ-XrObygyKs1_k_6xRKhI=/5760x/filters:no_upscale()/s3/static.nrc.nl/images/gn4/stripped/data88311411-7b1b2a.jpg "Opinion | The interview with the peace activist was mainly a correction of his claims")
