avril 21, 2025
Home » SKOMINA: I called numerous colleagues. He was not a penalty for Hajduk nor was he allowed to turn on at the time

SKOMINA: I called numerous colleagues. He was not a penalty for Hajduk nor was he allowed to turn on at the time

SKOMINA: I called numerous colleagues. He was not a penalty for Hajduk nor was he allowed to turn on at the time


Dynamo has hardly been killed by code Istria and practically dropped out of the race for the Croatian Championship title. Not over, but Dinamo does not give the impression that it is at all capable of fighting for the title until the end HNL. On the other hand, whatever the game is Hajduk or Rivers. The results are there. The citizens of Split beat the hit championship Slaven Belupo on a difficult guest appearance, Rijeka is to win at Locomotives led the hero Toni Fruk And it is more likely that the battle of the very end will be guided by just between that duo.

Judicial decisions and possible disputed situations 28. HNL a former elite judge commented Damir Skomina In the show « Tportal Judge Analysis » MaxSport Television.

Varaždin – Gorica 0-0, Judge: Duje Strukan

– There are no controversial situations.

Slaven – Hajduk 0-1, Judge: Igor Pajac



01:35

NK Slaven Belupo VS HNK Hajduk Split 0: 1


| Video: MaxSport/Hrvatski Telekom

All matches of the HNL Supersport HNL only look at MaxSport channel of Croatian Telecom.

44. MINUTES, HAND NESTOROVSKI, PAJAC changed the decision after VAR, played a penalty « I wonder how former players look at the situation, » Skomina asked, and and Hrvoje Vejić said:

– I really don’t know what’s a punitive hand anymore.

Josko Jelicic He was more eloquent.

– There is a penalty kick for Hajduk, not Belupo. I’m kidding, football, I would never have awarded this penalty kick. But this season there were a bunch of them. We cannot complain the judge.

He then explained the situation with Skomin.

– I called a couple of former colleagues who judged Gush with that. According to them, this is not a varnish intervention that the judge judged the field then remains. Because it is not a black and white situation where we have a clear answer. In order for Var to be involved, whatever the judge awarded, he should remain on that. It is a general court, without a varnish intervention. The judges have clear recommendations from the Commission, I am very interested in what the Commission will say on Monday. They are the ones who give the instructions and get a decree from them as they see it. According to what we were talking about, there should be no varnish or penalty. The judges lead the Commission and give them clear instructions, they must follow it.

79 minutes, Rakitic’s hand, Slaven penalty? – No talk. Rakitic first played with his foot and then hit him in the hand, which if he was more open, I would not say he was criminal. For first declined from the leg, from his body, so there is no talk of a penalty kick.

89. Minutes, bowl of buns and pumps – I am impressed that there is contact on the leg. That you are cracked by the one who makes contact on the blue player. A direct blow, but outside, there is no talk of a penalty kick. He is an ordinary offense, not for a card.

96 minutes, Kalik and Lucic danced in a sixteenth – Play further, you can see from the last recording that Kalik decided to fall as soon as he felt his hands. There must be a clear pulling, there is only the hand on the body of Kalik that falls. He is the one who goes to the ground and has no talk of a penalty.

Istria – Dinamo 3-0, Judge: Mateo Erceg

NK Istra 1961 VS GNK Dinamo Zagreb 3: 0


01:40

NK Istra 1961 VS GNK Dinamo Zagreb 3: 0


| Video: MaxSport/Hrvatski Telekom

All matches of the HNL Supersport HNL only look at MaxSport channel of Croatian Telecom.

9th minute, Rozic fell, a penalty for Istria? – We see that Dinamo (Pierre-Gabriel) played on the ball, she changed her direction. He stopped on the ground, did not knock down the Istria player. Even if he had played on the ball before and there was no talk of a penalty kick.

44. Minutes, Rozic hit Stojkovic, a yellow card? – In my opinion, because you can see that it is quite rough start. Only yellow and nothing more because it affects him in the Kopačka. If he had gone more, we could talk about something more. Erceg looks at the other side and that is why he did not feel that intensity and remained only in the offense.

Lokomotiva – Rijeka 0-1, Judge: Zdenko Lovric

NK Lokomotiva Zagreb VS NK Rijeka 0: 1


01:46

NK Lokomotiva Zagreb VS NK Rijeka 0: 1


| Video: MaxSport/Hrvatski Telekom

All matches of the HNL Supersport HNL only look at MaxSport channel of Croatian Telecom.

68. Minutes, duel Sigali and Jankovic, a penalty penalty? – For me, it’s too little for a penalty kick. Jankovic hit the ball, she was already out in theory. We didn’t have one in the game, which is the first condition to talk about the offense. Sigali goes to space and both go to each other. That contact is too strict for me for a penalty kick.

Šibenik – Osijek 4-1, Judge: Ante Terzić

HNK Šibenik VS NK Osijek 4: 1


01:40

HNK Šibenik VS NK Osijek 4: 1


| Video: MaxSport/Hrvatski Telekom

All matches of the HNL Supersport HNL only look at MaxSport channel of Croatian Telecom.

20th minute, Penal for Sibenik, Hand Jelenic – The last recording is the clearest. Unlike the situation with Hajduk, the hand is separated from the body and the shot towards the door. When the shot towards the door, things are more severely penalized. It may not be much separated by the hand than the one in Koprivnica, but we have a corner kick there, the defender changed the ball direction. We have a direct blow to the door here and it must be penalized.



View Original Source