Skomina confirmed all the decisions from Maksimir! ‘Livaja didn’t hide Faul, and I’m angry with one thing …’
We have the last round. I’m not here to defend anyone, but I was in that skin and I know how it is. I can’t understand that, it’s incomprehensible to me, said the former elite judge Damir Skomina In the show « Tportal Analysis » by MaxSport Television, talking about delegation of matches for matches that judge clubs from the same city where they live.
After 35. Circle HNL The situation in the fight for the champion is no clearer. Everything will be decided in the last round, and Skomina commented on problematic situations and decisions from this round.
Hajduk – Rijeka 2-1, Judge: Igor Pajac
01:42
HNK Hajduk Split VS NK Rijeka 2: 1
All matches of the HNL Supersport HNL only look at MaxSport channel of Croatian Telecom.
9th minute, Radeljic’s hand – Absolutely yes. I am under the impression that the ball hit both the first and second hand. If the other did not, the blow to the door and when we look from that concept, his hand should be all with the body, it should be completely closed. This is not the case, the openness of that hand is enough to penalize. On top of that, it hits him in the other hand. That has no doubt. For me, this is the correct VAR intervention.
56 minutes, Duel Livaja and Menal, Pajac changed the decision on the penalty after the VAR intervention – Here we can discuss whether this withdrawal is a long time or not. The judge marked that for him that withdrawal was a penalty kick because we see two men’s hands. That the judge decided on the field that it was too small for him, and to tell Var « see, for me it is a little », then okay, Var does not mix. But when we have this situation that the judge plays and that it is enough for him, VAR does not mix. I cannot understand the misunderstanding of the football game to indicate a meadow offense. He is the one who got a duel and went on. One is a tread when you go toward the rival and you push him. Livaja passed him. Who goes into whose space? Livaja has its own space. Menalo is behind him, we can’t expect him to watch where he will stop not to hit him when he passed him. From football viewing, I cannot understand that Var has become involved, nor is the judge who is there, that someone can convince him otherwise. It’s not a classic tread.
Istria – Šibenik 3-0, Judge: Tihomir Pejin
01:42
NK Istra 1961 VS HNK Šibenik 3: 0
All matches of the HNL Supersport HNL only look at MaxSport channel of Croatian Telecom.
32. Minutes, canceled goal goal after VAR check – A situation showing why there is a var. He is there to correct catastrophic mistakes like this. The judge shows that the game is the ball. Who? From a goalkeeper on which the offense is. He is prevented from defending his doors and that is why we have a var. It’s such a clear and obvious mistake. It is difficult to enter this championship more when VAR is intervention and when not. As we go to the end, the harmony has lost a lot.
Varaždin – Osijek 2-1, Judge: Patrik Pavlesic
01:24
NK Varaždin VS NK Osijek 2: 1
All matches of the HNL Supersport HNL only look at MaxSport channel of Croatian Telecom.
– There were no controversial situations.
Lokomotiva – Dinamo 1-1, Judge: Duje Strukan
01:43
NK Lokomotiva Zagreb VS GNK Dinamo Zagreb 1: 1
All matches of the HNL Supersport HNL only look at MaxSport channel of Croatian Telecom.
35 minutes, penalty for Dynamo, Daj evening and Sucic in contact, Var called Strukana – I don’t understand VAR intervention because we have a clear contact. That’s that moment. Quite simply, Var should get involved to tell him that he is contact and that the situation is outside and then it is not. And it’s inside and then it’s not the case. He should get involved when there is no contact and tell him he was totally wrong. We have contact and that is why I do not understand the VAR decision. Tomorrow we will hear a statement that is every Monday, so I wonder what it will be. These are situations that the judge plays on the ground, and they have to remain so. We can discuss whether the contact is strong or not. The judge on the field was determined, he also showed the end of the story.
77. Minutes, canceled naked locomotives, vasilja – We see that the red line, which is marked for the attacker, is in front of the blue and then it is the hinterland. I repeat for the 100th time, the lines do not pull out a cheerful judge but the system. Of the judge, it is only to indicate a point closest to the opposing line from the attacker and defensive. And then the system throws the lines itself. Due to transparency, it would be a good idea to see more clearly from the VAR room where the lines are more clearly seen, because there is a technology you have, it would be a good idea to see what is going on in the VAR room and how much it is, whether it is three, five or ten centimeters. The HNL does not have technology as in the Champions League, and the lines, for example, in Slovenia, the system is much more advanced and we do not have this problem. Technology is more or less very similar, but we have no problem drawing and whether the line is ahead or not. Not so much is a problem with the system, the lines can be solved and correct by next season. We live in spaces where doubt is everything and everything. To make it easier for judges, clubs and federations, that things are clearer … I don’t think it’s so much money. Second are additional cameras, which cost. I don’t go into that, it’s up to the covenant and these are their decisions. An eye line can be fixed.
84. Minutes, starting the Sigali on Kanga, yellow turned into a direct red card – I agree with VAR intervention because it is a starting start. This is not a place on the ground. The player who entered the exit of the injury recently. He can lose a few months there, and the player who is excluded in the worst case loses two or three games. The minimum is to correct such things and to protect the player. When punishing such things, it should be more rigorous as players on the field would feel safer. This is absolutely a varnish intervention, it goes to the end without any care of the rival. It must be punished with a red card. I can’t understand delegation. We have three cubes that fight for the title and I cannot understand that the match in which these clubs participate in the judges from that city. I was surprised that I was not on Hajduk – Rijeka saw a judge from Rijeka or Split. It is missing feelings and empathy for the referees because those who judge the matches cannot get anything but a diary and can lose a lot. One has to live in that city, these are the matches they decide. The commissioner who has decided this … misses empathy for these people who are exposed and cannot get much. The clubs cannot choose who will judge them, who is unsympathetic to them … Then we don’t need judges. When you have two rounds to the end and three fighting clubs … I can’t understand it. I would recommend the judges that when someone puts them on such a match to say « No, thank you ». No one with a rifle can make you judge. They all have integrity.
– Each game decides something, so let him judge the top five and to look at who is from where. Not putting someone who can have a long -term problem.
Slaven – Gorica 4-0, Judge: Zdenko Lovric
01:40
NK Slaven Belupo VS HNK Gorica 4: 0
All matches of the HNL Supersport HNL only look at MaxSport channel of Croatian Telecom.
– There were no controversial situations.
