Skomina analyzed 10 situations from the derby: ‘were not penalties for Hajduk, Faul Theophile for Yellow’
Celebrating Rivers against Gorice 2-1 on Rujevica ended the 33th round HNL. Dynamo had taken the lead in the championship for one day but had to leave it to the Rijeka people after No one Jankovic and Gabriel Vidovic demolished Goričane.
In this round, some unusual judicial decisions, even some omissions, occurred, and the center of the trial was, of course, on the derby Hajduk and Dinamo. His view of the 33th round was given by a former elite judge Damir Skomina In the show « Tportal Judge Analysis » MaxSport Television.
– The derby as such, especially so important where a lot is decided, was judged by a young international judge Mateo Erceg. I liked his criterion that did not play small contacts. He lifted it to a level. The match, especially in the first part, was managing. She didn’t offer what people like to watch, in the second part it was better. But I think he did the job well.
Varazdin – Sibenik 1-1, Judge: Zdenko Lovric
01:39
Summary Varaždin – Šibenik 1-1
All matches of the HNL Supersport HNL only look at MaxSport channel of Croatian Telecom.
29 minutes, Varazdin sought a penalty – The judge on the ground decided that he saw contact and that it was small for him. In this communication, he tells VAR that this is small for him. We have a push, but the ball goes toward the goal of the car and the attacker is aware of it. For me, this contact is too small, VAR does not mix and this is not a situation for var, but when there is a very obvious mistake. And if he played him, Var must support him. This is not a situation where of 100 judges of all 100 they will say « absolutely » or « absolutely not ». I think it would be 70-30 if it didn’t play.
Hajduk – Dinamo 1-3, Judge: Mateo Erceg
01:41
Hajduk – Dinamo 1-3 (Summary)
All matches of the HNL Supersport HNL only look at MaxSport channel of Croatian Telecom.
18 minutes, Rusin fell in the sixester after contact with the muscle, a penalty penalty? – You said well, he fell. The muscle does nothing. The Hajduk player is the one who goes to him and seeks contact. If we go into detail, it’s more simulation. There is no « P » from the offense. I can agree that the derby judge satisfied himself that he was playing further, there was no talk of an offense.
20th minute, conflict between Baturine and Livaja – I think it is better without a cardboard because there was no great confrontation. Erceg managed to calm the situation. He pulled them over and made it clear that the derby derby, but must be known where. The management is quite okay.
28. Minutes, muscle duel and meadows – The judge looks at it from the back where the muscle goes to the ball. If he had given him yellow, okay, but to me, this is not a situation that dates in my eyes. Football is a contact sport and I do not see that this is a situation where it must be a yellow card.
36 minutes, Stojkovic is lying, rising, Erceg decided to stop the game, Badrov blushed – I don’t know if the judge was aware that he was lying or someone had thrown him and told him, so he automatically did it. When Stojkovic started rising … It’s best to keep quiet because the player must lie to help him. We come to the situation that the bench is crazy, but it does not give it the right … I understand the reaction, but it must be moderate. The blood is hot, the Hajduk representative went across the border and Erceg turned it off.
43. Minutes, Theophile offense on Dialle, red? – There are no elements, it’s absolutely yellow and that’s enough. Because we’re not talking about a pure chance of hit. Start as such is only for a yellow card, we see another Dinamo player here, and and Diallo goes a lot from the side. That five, six meters to the right, that there are no Dinamo players … The instructions are clear and only a yellow card. In order to be red, we have to have eight or nine out of ten times in our heads. We also get the answer from players. We generalize, we are talking about the average player of any league.
47. Minutes, Sego fell in front of Ristovsky, was not awarded an offense – Shego falls on his own. We are closer to simulating than offense. I wouldn’t say it’s a pure and clear situation, but it’s not an offense. So there is no speech. We saw Sega before in Varazdin that he knew how to potentiate some things. The preparation of the match is very important.
55. Minutes, the pierre-gabriel hinterland, which shot the ball below, was looking for yellow – To be honest, I would show him. Is that he has only been a second and a half earlier, but you can see … you have to assess that Gabriel knows what he is doing and hit her. The instruction is that if it is really very close after the whistle, it is not given, but it feels that he intentionally hits her.
91 minutes, Hajduk sought a penalty, fell trajkovski in a duel with Theophile – Var must only be turned on when something is clear and clean. The consultations with VAR were absolutely, they were beating it and it was not a clear or obvious mistake for them. As well as for me. Unlike the previous round, where I cannot agree with the commission that has amnesty that I am too little, I still stand that Theophile has previously made a foul over Fruk. That he was pure Faul and that he should have been a second yellow card because of the interruption of a promising action, we can give the definition that the contact is too small and that it is something clear and obvious. Erceg kept his criterion, probably during the game he was under the prism that Rusin went, how shego … absolutely, nor would I play him on the field. The commission will probably confirm the same. Trajkovski is very static, while Fruk played the ball and was quite high speed. There is no need to justify something that is almost impossible to justify. There was a pure yellow and an offense, we agreed there that there was no penalty kick.
99 minutes, Uremovic hit Roga, Rakitic forced Dinamo doctor – Rakitic has to be absolutely understood that time is leaking, and that he wants this to come out. There is no percentage to talk about anything. And that is very difficult to see when they went to dissect that he had slapped him. Who can see that? They could talk about a yellow card, but there’s nothing red. These situations are for videoanalysis, you can’t see them on the field. He can’t call Var assuming and ask « if he banged him. » They cannot have exactly information on how he hit him, he should not be split, nor would I give him a card.
101 minutes, Lika and Galešić’s jump, Erceg let the advantage – Too bad because your biggest advantage is a free kick with 22, 23 meters. You have a lot of chance and that is the biggest advantage. The instruction is two three seconds, even that four have passed. You have to have a sense of play. There may be a shortage of experience, but it was quite a chance for Hajduk players to point. It is a pity that Erceg did not recognize it even after three, four seconds he played offense.
Lokomotiva – Istra 0-0, Judge Antonio Melnjak
01:41
Lokomotiva – Istria
All matches of the HNL Supersport HNL only look at MaxSport channel of Croatian Telecom.
18th minute and 43 minutes two yellow cards of pots – On the first, everything is clear, he let the advantage and then gave it to him for obvious tread. The second is not a problem on the instructions, but it was a problem that the judge was not aware that he had it. He made Okay according to the instructions, but in the spirit of the match you have to be aware and to approach the player and tell him to remove his hands and not gesture. You need to know how to manage. As management, it’s really bad. Should be principled. Let’s remember the euro 2024. When only the captains were allowed to talk to the judge. Generally, we do not have a group of judges who are consistent, which holds one hundred percent to everything and does not deviate. According to the instructions, he gave both cards right, but obviously he was not aware that Loncar had a card. He was not taken and forgot that he had given it to him 15, 20 minutes ago.
49 minutes, Lawala falls in the sixester – The key to everything is to get a game with a ball. And it doesn’t have to do with it anymore. He goes on the ball properly. We can talk if Lawal has made contact, no talk of a penalty kick.
Slaven – Osijek 1-4, Judge: Ivan Vukancic
01:42
Slaven Belupo – Osijek
All matches of the HNL Supersport HNL only look at MaxSport channel of Croatian Telecom.
6th minute, penalty for Osijek – I think the player does the movement and that penalizes it. Last round we had a very similar situation on the goal line, I can pull the parallel to the parallel. The recording shows that it is in the biceps area, but on the outside. The judge decided that he was a penalty, Var must have absolute proof that he had not touched him or touched him in the shoulder. That’s why they supported him.
25th minute, Omerovic’s goal, was the impact of a teammate – He’s even out of the ball path, he would have to be closer to the goalkeeper to say. Even left a little. At first he can see the ball and he is not a player who gets away. I agree with the decision.
78 minutes, canceled penalty for Osijek – I don’t see the start. Osijek’s player is the one who releases his feet, so with his right and left he requires contact. It is absolutely not a penalty kick. I am not sure that there is one hundred percent of interventions, but when I see his feet asking for contact, I am much closer that there is no talk of a penalty kick but to support such a penalty kick.
Rijeka – Gorica 2-1, Judge Duje Strukan
01:29
Rijeka – Gorica
All matches of the HNL Supersport HNL only look at MaxSport channel of Croatian Telecom.
– There are no controversial situations.
