Seselj Story, the Prosecution is silent: presenting private data to the student at Informer – Society

Seselj commented on the show at the Informer commented on Stillweight, and soon set out to be information on the detainees.

On the moment he was detained, the first student Informer published his photograph, the name and surname, from where he was studying at the college. Seselj confirmed that he had the same information about him, but then made private information about the second-brought student, who, in his words, because he informed Pavlović in the group of students living in this home.

He first brought the name and surname of the brought Mladic, then his private phone number, the date of birth and the faculty he studied. The situation was culminated when Seselj cited the address of the residence of the arrested student, the name of the parent, the information where his parents were employed. He also put out and which insurance the student had, when he received a scholarship, and he also said that he had his ID number, but that he would not be out « because it must not work in the show. »

At any point, his leader of the Informer did not interrupt, nor attempted to stop him, and Seselj said the information was obtained « through some police services ».

The Protector of Citizens Zoran Pašalić is on the issue of Danas whether the proceedings against Seselj, due to the presentation of these private information, replied that it was not within its competence, but the competence of the Commissioner for Information of Public Importance and Personality Protection.

Milan Marinović, the Commissioner for Information of Public Importance and Personality Protection, explains that if they receive an official representation of a damaged person (student) or anyone else to the service of the Commissioner to make a decision on the basis of.

« According to the media, we do not have the ingredients, but according to the source we can see. We need to write all the data and details in writing to be able to start and evaluate, » says Marinovic.

Lawyer Rodoljub Sabic explains that this Seselj’s procedure causes doubt in the commission of a criminal offense from Art. 146 KZ ST.1 or ST.2 « Unauthorized Collection of Personal Data » for which the sentence of imprisonment for up to 1 year was threatened.

« Informer could defend in the specific situation that he did not know that Seselj would take personal information and given the situation even if he wanted to prevent it, » Sabic states.

He believes that most importantly and much more interesting than moves and Seselj and Informer’s question – where did all these information about personalities come from?

« In this regard, there is a completely established suspicion that the data received the crime from the official part of Article 146. The work should be hired. I do not expect it, but I remind you that it is from St.3 Art.146 The sentence of up to 3 years in prison was threatened, « says Sabic.

The Viktor Gostiljac indicates that it is comment on Seselj’s statements and the entire narrative of Informer as a classic party propaganda van beyond legal logic and represents a waste of time.

« What we listen to every day from these waves is part of an orchestrated harangu on the most troublesome things. Seselj is just the ugly face and pronounced what his orders really think. »

Our interlocutor points out that it is interesting that any difference between Seselj’s performance and the representation of the president of the state – « His student » appears.

The guestbook adds that the publication of private data on some person is definitely illegal, but that no one cares about it here anymore.

« We all live in a circus, in which the facts, context and evidence, is divided by internal fighting, and so it may be expected to continue this ‘wild West’ in the public space, to lead things to absurdities – and that citizens Understand what awaits us if we do not take care of our rights, it was in the election. Until then, we would be waged and spending with Seseljism – in the broadest sense of that word, « the guests concluded.

Today, he failed to contact Vojislav Seselj nor to ask him questions as he reached a private student data and why he had needs to present them publicly.

The performance of Vojislav Seselj is another confirmation that laws in Serbia do not apply equally for everyone. Regardless of the presentation of personal information about the student, he was threatened by his security and security of his parents are a small chance that the competent authorities will have any reaction to this de facto violation of the law.