Reactions after suspending the election cancellation decision
Former CCR judge Augustin Zegrean commented Cancellation of the Constitutional Court’s decision on the presidential elections of December 2024.
« The decision of the Ploieşti Court of Appeal is hazard, it is obviously inadmissible. The CCR decisille are not administrative acts, they are definitive, generally compulsory judicial decisions, » said the former president of CCR Augustin Zegrean for G4media.ro.
Tudorel Toader also former judge has a similar opinion
« The decision of the judge of the Ploieşti Court of Appeal does not produce legal effects because it is clearly said that the CCR decisions are definitive, generally compulsory from the moment of publication in the Official Gazette and are not subject to common law, they have no appeal, » he told for G4media.ro Tudorel Toader.
Former Judge Cristi Danileţ wrote in a Facebook post that « The judge who resolved the case has abused the judicial power ”.
« A court cannot suspend or annul a decision of the RCC, such as the annulment of the presidential elections of December 2024. The more a CCR decision that has already been implemented, by issuing the GD to organize new elections, in May 2025. How to suspend something that has already been applied?
Of course, if we decide otherwise we have to deal with a judicial aberration, which produces the following consequences:
-the respective judge risks being disciplinary investigated for the bad faith application;
– the solution will be corrected by the ICCJ;
– INM must make special sessions for the preparation of magistrates in administrative law and constitutional law.
Lawyer Adrian Toni Neacșu, former judge and former member of the SCM, says that the decision of the Ploiești Court of Appeal can raise question marks in relation to the current elections.
Lawyer Ingrid Mocanu commented live on Realitatea Plus the implications of the Ploiești Court of Appeal regarding the decision to annul the elections in 2024.
« It must be checked if it is on the court portal and it is there, I checked, this is very clear. We just have to check if it is a real solution or it is a result of a cyber attack, these would be the only doubts whether or not the solution is real.
Now it is certain that it has been decided to suspend the decision 32 and practically the implementation of the decision 31 that referred to the organization of the tour.
Not this bulb will have any attribution. In the worst case, if it is maintained and now that should have done, to see if the 1 tour is organized or we resume the tour 2, because now the bulb should suspend its activity until we see what happens with this decision if it is real, if it produces any effect or if it is a simple deceit.
Otherwise, Tour 2 must be resumed with Mr. Georgescu and Mrs. Lasconi, if it is real and if he stays at the High Court of Cassation and Justice, ”said Ingrid Mocanu at Realitatea Plus.
/s3/static.nrc.nl/images/gn4/stripped/data130955106-94d829.jpg "A kidney for Corwin – NRC")