« Prime Minister Macut – Zoran Radojicic 2.0 »: Is there any results after a month of the new Government of Serbia? – Politics
Monthly after the election of the new government, Prime Minister Macuta was held, but there is still no solutions to the crisis and effective dialogue, and as our interlocutors point out, citizens do not expect it, because they know where real political authority finds it.
When choosing a new government, the ruling majority, and previously and President of Serbia, Aleksandar Vučić, persistently reiterated that it was a huge and difficult job before Macut and new ministers, to reconcile Serbia, to preserve and initiate dialogue.
On the other hand, this government is perceived in public as Vučić’s replacement for the expert government requested by the Opposition Members.
For these thirty days, the Prime Minister, but some ministers have tried to meet the government expectations by initiating talks with different groups.
So Macut is already in the first days in the prime minister on the meeting called the Rector Bu Vladimir Djokić, while the Minister of Justice Nenad Vujic called on the judiciary employees, and the Minister of Education Dejan Vuk Stankovic met with representatives of Enlightenment Trade Unions, and announced (and canceled) a meeting of the new draft Law on Higher Education.
Professor Faculty of Political Sciences Bojan Vranić reminds that there is a mantra to give the government in Serbia to give up some assessments.
« But when it’s close to half, the government has launched certain initiatives around dialogue in problem areas, but not specific results, » our interlocutor says.
Vranic points out that the communication characteristic of Macut’s government is not to be published in public until the principle of « nothing is almost almost complete ».
« Thus, we get on a spoon of information from the other side in negotiations, but not from the ministers themselves, » he says.
Speaking about whether the new government has managed to maintain the government’s image, Vranić says that Serbia is so polarized that it is almost impossible to find a rational criterion according to which the success of the dialogue would be assessed.
« Each rating is actually one of the » UA « or » Hooray « . However, these dialogues do not act as a routine job, » the interlocutor of Danas is not in a hurry that the crisis is at least imminent, if he cannot be solved.
Aleksandar Ivković, the Center for Contemporary Policy, for today, says that the government may have achieved the perception of who guides dialogue and represents the government’s government, but only with government supporters.
« It’s a policy we see for some time – that the SNS tries to go with some people who are in their field, because the SNS voters themselves are often disappointed in personnel solutions, especially political, » said our interlocutor.
Ivković adds that Vučić did it and by placing Macut and other ministers who are close to the movement for people and the state and experts in their areas.
According to such voters, the government has left a good impression for such voters, but that it is not the most important in political life, and that this impression will quickly wear out because it is not expected to actually achieve some important results.
« As for the perception of the dialogue again and it is something that may be supporters and the prime ministers to do, but I think most of the public is that the government has no political authority in the President of the Republic, » Ivkovic says.
It reminds it, not in line with the Constitution, but « such is a reality ».
« Therefore, if the Government is conducted by a dialogue, it cannot conclude the parts of society on some important issues without the President of the Republic, so that its possibility is not so significant, » says Danas said.
He adds that the most attractive is that all a conscious gap between a formal and actual political power that is in the president.
« It turned out, as predicted, that Prime Minister Macut – Zoran Radojicic 2.0, ie as the former mayor of Belgrade, » very little mixed in his job « unlike Ana Brnabić and Miloša Vucevićwhich, as prime ministers, gave the impression that, although monitoring political directives of Vučić, they still manage the government, « Ivković points out.
The interlocutor of Danas emphasizes that this perception exists with the general population, even in government supporters.
« The government is perceived as very weak and marginal, and expectations are almost non-existent. With some moves can produce a positive impression of supporters of government, but that positive impression is short breath, » he concludes.
Follow us on our Facebook and Instagram page, but also on X account. Subscribe to PDF List release today.
