Placing in space

Continuous adherence to the slowness of placement procedures exceeds all boundaries. The last news of the law that will accelerate placement in the space encouraged me to sound.

I have been following the field since 1999. As an employee of the opinion, I have been actively involved in the placement processes in the space of all kinds for 24 years. I deeply believe that we do not really need significantly more staff in municipalities or other institutions that participate in this. Not a special law.

As a civil servant, I have repeatedly wondered how many coordination of the same spatial planning act the state pays me. In practice, the number was unlimited, so it can run out of time for the rest. The placement procedures in the space and the procedures for issuing building permits also interfere with the continuous amendment of the legislation and the introduction of outstanding procedures outside the established regulations.

What we need are stable legal bases and a strong defense line against investors who build their visions without thought of valid spatial acts of municipalities. The spatial planning act is the basis for the successful placement of an idea into the space. The length of the processes of preparation and changes to the spatial planning documents is proportional to the discrepancy of new ideas with applicable rules for landscaping. The greater the discrepancy, the more public services in the ministries and institutions need to be visited, and often many times. These are all lobbying that should be officially detected but not. And so because of the persistence of one or two investors, the process of preparing or changing the spatial planning act can last, which makes many small users forced to wait for the years to build their small plots.

This strong defense line can only be provided by civil servants committed to professional work in the spatial planning system. From the lowest staff to the secretaries, ministers and Prime Minister. The mayors, secretaries and ministers who will at least know the spatial system will also be assisted.

I think that it would be good to establish a movement me too/I, a safe place to report professional harassment that employees in the public sector from the bottom up to the level that gives up. What kind of society we are – to prosecute old acts in the field of sexual integrity, and in professional inviolability that is not and its violation is happening this moment, the general opinion applies: so it is …

If we do not continue to change the legislation and manage to establish the aforementioned defense line so that spatial planners and opinioners will no longer have to deal with problematic ideas for a long time, it will probably remain time to look into the future, consider the future use of space and prepare such spatial planning documents so that a building permit can be obtained within four days. We definitely have enough experts.