New method tracks each king crab

Individual marking of king crab has been highlighted as an important measure to gain better control of resources and prevent illegal catch.

Now it has also been documented that the animal welfare can be safeguarded, as long as the brand is set correctly, reports the Fisheries and Aquaculture Industry Research Finance (FHF).

In the research project Merkrabbart, Nofima has investigated how different branding methods affect the welfare of king crab. The study shows that T-Bar marking in the back shield causes low mortality, little damage and no negative effect on meat quality or food safety.

-The use of T-Bar is by far the most effective method for marking king crab. It has been important for the industry to document how the method affects animal welfare, hygiene and food safety, says Frank Jakobsen, specialist and FHF manager for the project in a press release.

Proper labeling

Although inflammatory reactions were recorded around the main point, the project shows that the vitality, bacterial level and physiological values ​​of the crab are not adversely affected.

To ensure good animal welfare, the mark must be placed in the rear of the back shield – a little to the side of the center line – without damaging the fourth walk, which the crab uses to clean the gills.

The researchers recommend the use of brand gun with depth stops and T-Bar with dual anchor, which ensures the correct placement and prevents the mark from being deeply or pulled inward into the crab. It is also emphasized that the method should not be used on crabs that should undergo shell change, as the T-bar can prevent the animal from getting rid of the shell.

Exclusive food with clear origin

The T-Bar label can also be linked to information about where and when the crab was caught. It gives both chef and quality -conscious private individuals an extra dimension – a story on the plate.

When origin and catch site become visible, the credibility of both sustainability and quality is strengthened. This is particularly relevant for living king crab, which is currently exported to high paying markets, writes FHF.

Little project but an important signal

The project is a follow-up of previous work on branding and tracking technology for king crab, and is part of a larger picture where the FHF works for better resource control in both whitefish, pelagic and salmon fisheries.

Although the topic may seem narrow, it sends a clear signal of the industry’s awareness and willingness to prioritize animal welfare, even in measures that are primarily about control and tracking.

The noticeable project shows that it is quite possible to combine documented animal welfare, food safety and the opportunity to tell a good story.

FHF writes that it gives the crab more than just value in kroner – it gives it grade.