My work is not a job. My work calls and calls

Some time ago, officials from Brussels have sent a kind of survey to all EU Member States on the topic of promoting and paying intellectual property in individual countries. A very topical question at a time when original human creativity is trying to replace artificial intelligence. Phenomenal.

I am a creative man. Music, literary, audiovisual author and producer or publisher. For forty years, I was going some kind of Don Quixote. I am fighting with innovations that society is too fast and without consideration incorporating into our daily lives. I do not like the heat, much less I wear « artificial wit ». Both first and second does not lead in the right direction.

To be honest, in the madness there is also a crumb of mind. From the point of view of data processing or data offering, of course, there is no doubt that artificial intelligence (UI) is brilliant with its capacities and speed. However, it is severely disabled and topglav in terms of genuine human creativity as the navel and the meaning of life on this planet.

So I am one of those who try to inhibit UI. I think and create as a slow and prudent man. My muse has borne seven music albums, three books, just over two hundred articles and journalistic articles. Most of the creation and realization, however, goes to the expense of nearly a thousand parts of documentary and feature series, which are and still achieve excellent results. Mostly also positive responses from the professional public. My ideas and my colleagues bring laughter, reflection, tears and, above all, set a mirror to Slovenian society. My work is not a job. My work calls and calls. Without stamping and without the right to disconnect.

As a screenwriter, music or literary author, I have always strived for originality, novelty, unexpected. In recent years, there have been more and more words in our Western society, which is supposed to expel and destroy genuine human creativity. As I read this kind of records, I am increasingly wondering who is the writer of the text I read, watch or listen to. My ear sharpened to recognizing « artificially intelligent authorship. » I quickly hear and see when the contents of the digital author's feud are presented. And it's more and more. It recognizes itself by silly grammar mistakes and profans and a already seen or heard story. Artificial intelligence will never create a substantive novelty. Never. Because it is doomed to heard, seen and made. Among the thousands of sentences, he chooses the most successful. But never come up with your sentence. He does not have his thoughts.

Thought and text are fatally related to emotion. May it be love, fear, pride, anger … anything that is human. Emotions give birth to new stories. The context of the written is inseparable with the present state and the heart of the creator. Only in such a spiritual-social-social and culturally indigenous environment can Zdravljica form. Or fashion trend. Or politics.

How should artificial intelligence understand the joke? Or rebellion? Or silent protest? Not to mention the extremes of hunger strikes. All of the above has artificial intelligence written on its disks. He feels absolutely nothing. The creativity of artificial intelligence is a skilled reader or analogue creator as interesting as sex with plastic Ancka. Anka is nicely quiet, does not complicate it, she is not too hot or too cold… She doesn't hurt, without words, she goes away, then she disappears from her thoughts and from life. As a little deviation of nature, it returns to the hidden cabinet drawer.

Something else is a long conquest and courting to the true human female Anja, who smells, can return views, seeks security, tests the persistence of the male John. Invites into space. He can say no. To be unfavorable. She can punish and reward John, who has been grinding around her for months. And then it happens. You can imagine what thoughts or emotions are hovering in the air.

And here's the hidden point. If John is an artist, he will write a new sonnet wreath or play a new song on the basis of events in recent months after that evening. Or will Anja do it. It is definitely true that the mixed mixes of thoughts, emotions, scents and secrets will not put Anka from the drawer in the closet.

This world has one big trap. Not everyone knows how to write songs and stories, recorded a movie, carve the statue … Those who have (re) call from space to write down, sing, draw, carve, are in a terrible minority. Endated with hypersensitivity, they suffer as they observe what is happening. They give up one day, the next day they return with the words of optimism. They do, but they don't understand it as work. With teeth clenched, free of charge and heartache are realized. They are ready to live, be hungry and thirsty for their record. Willing to die.

Here I allow myself to ask how artificial intelligence understands the thoughts just written.

Being, the property and sediment or patina of creation and creator cannot understand the machine. This is a deviation from the majority. But digital machines are preferable, average, center. All those who walk along the established valley trails and do not sail through the turbulent seas.

The discarded stone wanted to become a corner stone. We would all want to live a tense movie. To experience and describe our romantic experience … But we don't dare and do not know it. For the most part, people are not ready to put everything they have to say what they can tell their heads or joy. They, too, would win the girls old -fashioned, with the smell and the tremor, but they don't do it. Disks calculate us in a second that we will reach the first date to a hundred times faster than through old social mating ceremonies.

All those who would therefore be romantic analog seducers and go to court the old, of course know and benefit the digital world. The digital world is a non -treasure alpha and omega. Ui makes them easier for them. Writes speeches. School plans. Navigates surgery. Such digital freaks, of course, quickly delete all the information and records of the potential partner when predicting the physical encounter of the male and females. Unknowingly, they already take a fatally wrong step. When it comes to a date, because of the use of each other, you already know everything.

Wrong!

UI and its users do not know that they have false information in their research online. We humans are just that we lie about ourselves, retouch and pretend. Thus, between Anja and John, about two hundred stacked or missed sentences, thinking, assets, jokes and trendy debates, which have been served and created by UI as the most popular truth. Globally, among all the Johns and Anja of the world, the same folded sentences, the same taste, the same trends … Disaster! Since UI writes stacked sentences to the vast majority of non -real people, we get global trendy gray. I have noticed that influencers, celebrities and politicians are increasingly using UI. Everyone is the same. They all repeat the same pleigh and empty sentences. Green transition, tolerance, human rights, democracy, peace in the world – as if we were on a permanent selection of Miss World.

Former analog creatives – screenwriters, writers, directors, composers, cameramen, painters, sculptors … – are increasingly using UI. They steal at ten ends and assemble into a new copyright work. They have been stolen, but now do they ask for copyright? Modern business and business.

And in such a time and environment, therefore, a survey already comes from Brussels – a letter that asks all EU countries how they manage to protect the copyright of classical authors who once created themselves, and on the other hand, how we today deal with new creations that have emerged (knowing or unknowingly) with UI.

Dear Necreative UI Slovenia and Europe. In Slovenia, an honest and classic author, the owner of domestic rights, has long managed to manage its intellectual property. He was torn from his hands by officials who never created anything. One author, one voice is their democratic principle, supported by a crowd of unsuccessful and less successful friends. They eternally override the minority of successful ones. Except for the vote that we no longer go one game one voice, but one work one voice. The one who created a hundred units of work should have a hundred votes. And the one who created one unit of work should have one voice. Digital freaks and plagiaries, ask your chatgpt, where to economically and culturally lead the voting balancing. The insensitive computer will uncomfortably announce the nasty end of creativity, development, progress.

When we no longer have creativity, we will still have officials of collecting organizations or state regulations, and they will inform you with artificial intelligence in the EU that in Slovenia they are counting that new -age complications and problems with UI creativity are taken care of.

The classic analog author, an indigenous creator who has only really done something new, will be eliminated and discarded.

The discarded stone will become a corner stone?

No! During the green passage, the rise of the UI and the totalitarian democracy, corner stones are becoming discarded.

***

Tomaž Grubar, Outfluencer.

The article is the opinion of the author and does not necessarily express the position of the editorial board.