Meaningless interceptions that went on a navigation

« Wlices that were very unclear what purpose served, were stored in a very free way, did not carry out supervision and then went on the navigation of some people who decided to sell themselves and his immorality of the highest bidder, » says Oddur Ástrådsson, lawyer and co -owner of the law.

Furthermore, Oddur points out that Sigríður J. Friðjónsdóttir State Prosecutor had said in 2011 that the office could not supervise the shutter. This included monitoring data deletion.

As has been stated, Jón Óttar Ólafsson and Guðmundur Haukur Gunnarsson, then police officers at the office of special prosecutor, wounding and investigative data without voluntary hand. They used the data to sell their services in the consulting firm PPP.

Gass gang at the expense of human rights

In 2015, Oddur wrote a dissertation in law on interceptions, MA in connection with the collapse of the old banks in 2008. He has followed the issue with interest since then.

He says the stories of police officers on data other threads reflect that the purpose has devoted the average when it came to investigating the alleged violations of bankers.

« I feel like news is now being received that data from the shutter were stolen from the office of special prosecutor that there, the warrior made the beauty be overpowered and performed with a gas walk at the expense of human rights, » says Oddur.

Interceptions not served any purpose

« The interceptions served no purpose and I am not aware that they were useful to any of the criminal cases that were going on after the crash, » says Oddur, pointing out that most of the interceptions had been carried out many years after the alleged violation. Usually interceptions are used to get on the break for a break that is about to commit.

99.3% of telephone shutters were approved in 2008-2012.

mbl.is/golli

Sigríður said he could not carry out supervision

He says that there were no registered rules on the treatment of calls recorded in the shutter. It was stated in the case of Ólafur Þór Hauksson, current district attorney and former special prosecutor, in a conversation with mbl.is yesterday that staff had access to them by suitability without monitoring it.

« It does not change that the police had to make sure that this data never went to an unauthorized person and never wandering, » says Oddur.

« A special prosecutor carried out the interception, but the State Prosecutor was supposed to monitor their legitimacy. But both were in a lame.

Prosecutor said he could not carry out supervision

The supervision was to be in the hands of the State Prosecutor. In this context, it is worth mentioning that in 2011, Sigríður J. Friðjónsdóttir, State Prosecutor, wrote an article in the Journal of the Association of Lawyers under the heading Prosecution at a crossroads where she states that the office is unable to carry out the statutory supervision. She carried a financial shortage and a man in the industry.