Lies in foam, frightened as it encompasses

After leaving the government, Marcel Ciolacu received another branches on the stairs. The system’s vuvuzes jumped to him by crooking in the back after the former prime minister announced that PSD members and supporters have the freedom to vote as they want in the second round. A traitor! Instead of killing Nicușor Dan – who for years he made the pigs of pigs – the PSD leader left the vote at the free.

In the despair with which Antena 3 and the Sorosists with old states of payment scormins according to possible pro-Brussel voters, Ciolacu’s decision is equivalent to a national betrayal. He could even make a criminal case.

The chief of post A3 gave Ucaz to be fished the slightest rebellion at Ciolacu’s decision. The mayor of Buzau opened the ball. It is called at A3 three times a day, like Ampicillin. The latter comes strong Fifor, a colorless and translucent character who runs PSD Arad from ancient times and dedemm.

Mungiu: « Simion’s voters are fascists »

The propaganda due « A3+G4 » sounds insistently the bell to the prosecutors, showing that not voting Nicușor Dan is a neighboring cowardice. Alina Mungiu-Pippidi, a veteran of the manipulations since the time, in a campaign for parliament, throws over the cities of liars butterflies with the names of the corrupt in the city. Now he comes out of the can, press the alarm sirens on the blocks and hurry in the country to ideologically base the call to battle: « You would look for defects of Nicușor Dan and Criminal Loss of the weather. Dear artists, teachers, entrepreneurs, workers, pensioners, cinema stars, and you need to go to the country. Proeuropean vote! ”.

The delirium of the distinguishing is total. Only the three co-trees placed on an A3 crack equals it every afternoon.

In Alina Mungiu’s opinion, those who do not vote Nicușor Dan « do not deserve respect » because they are « a fascist audience »: « The mercenaries of Georgescu, the trolls on Tik Tok, the interloping world that stand with the outstretched hand, supporting the sovereigns, the goals on the Internet or the miners who ambuscate the world on the street, the legionaries, the anti -Semites are not an audience deserving, they are a fascist audience. ».

This is how Madame Mungiu sees Romanians, from the distance of the 20 years since she says she is « professor abroad ».

A small criminal case could also be made to Crin Antonescu. His statement on Wednesday, that he will not be used again to vote on Nicușor, is also equivalent to a kind of national betrayal. Posting he made is a reply and Avant at Lettre given to the ideological excitement with which Alina Mungiu called the « dear artists » to fight: « I have the right not to be taken in the flock for a new « rescue » of the country. I have my own choice. Do not take me with the arcan of general mobilization. Be smooth, my friends, as many as you will be. We’ll talk like people. Free, not captive in the stupidity of propaganda ”. A bit serious this disagreement of Crin Antonescu.

PPE, the new Comintern

In the milk of the elections in the second round, two European flies are mixed: Manfred Weber and Siegfried Mureșan, the president and the vice -president of the European People’s Party group. Without entering them in the job description the censorship of the decisions of a national party of another ideology, they condemn the PSD decision not to recommend its members to vote Nicușor Dan, in the second round.

The two servants of Ursula Van der Leynen have signed a statement saying that « DThe Ecizia of the Social Democratic Party in Romania is simply unacceptable. I am waiting for a clear commitment from them to support the only pro-European candidate, ”said Manfred Weber.

Siegfrid Mureșan holds his buzz: « A anti-European, populist and extremist candidate, such as George Simion, who has a prohibition to enter both Ukraine and the Republic of Moldova, represents a threat not only for Romania’s security, but also for the whole European Union. »

What right does Weber pronounce on the decisions of a national party? No accession treaty gives this right. Weber does not specify, but we can suspect who is « unacceptable » the PSD decision to leave the vote free. The fear of Mrs. Der Leynen, that the sovereignism in its empire extends, has also been at the origin of the November election order.

The press release signed by the two PPE leaders is just an example that gives water to the mill for sovereignism. It is unprecedented for a Pan-European political group to comment on the decisions of a national party that activates legally in a Member State. This model worked only during the Comintern.

It is true, Weber is held in the leash. Last autumn, he is criminally investigated for hijacking funds. In his own Elctroral campaign he used personnel payed by the PE. In the joke of the handcuffs, he executes whatever is told.

However, we turned and succeed, the reaction of the PPE leaders shows that they understand the relationships between the national parties, on the one hand, and the political groups constituted in Brussels, on the other hand, similar to the Cominternist practices. Shall we wonder why sovereignism is strengthened?

In the Treaty of Accession to the EU, there is no reference to any « alignment » of the national parties under the command of the parties « from the center » and no prescriptions about whom and how to vote in different electoral cycles.

Deeply unacceptable is the attitude of the two PPE leaders, and not the sovereign decision (does this word?) Of a national party to announce their members that they can vote as they wish.

Siegfrid, a tree on the wheels

As for Siegfrid Mureșan, there would be not much to say. He is one of the individuals who, once he climbed into the Brussels plane, forgot where he left off. It’s a tree on the wheels. Without roots. Slips easily through life, pirates beside the walls, Ubi Bene, IBI Patriawith profitable stops at the EU cashiers. He has a villa in Belgium, his wife worked at a bank there, it is in the second term of MEP, he has the insured pension. Usher.

It is understandable why he speaks with such satisfaction about how forbidden Simion is in R.Moldova and Ukraine. But is that good or bad?

The new Moldovan leaders have absolutely no propensity towards the union. The union they talk about only paints the fence, but inside it is the leopard of preserving the privileges. The Capro-Varzist formula, that « we will unite within the EU », actually expresses the definitive burial of the Unionist momentum of the 90’s.

The union would mean that from Chisinau the important functions of any state disappear, the flag of the UN disappears, the functions of president, prime minister, parliamentarians disappear, many other governors and privileges will be evaporated.

This is how it explains why Unionism Honestly for whom Simion has publicly advocated since 2009 has collided with Statalism quasi-car to Maia Sandu. From the perspective of Chisinau, it is understandable why a militant for union was thrown across the border.

But how do we consider Simion from the perspective of Romania, do we, from the Prut,? As a militant patriot for union or as a « enemy » of the Republic of Moldova? Siegfrid considers him an enemy of Romania because he was forbidden in Moldova!

The same thing is the same with Simion’s prohibition in Ukraine. Last fall, at the pressure of the head of A3, Prime Minister Ciolcu asked Kiev explanations about this decision. And Simion, who was required to confirm that he was a Russian agent, has returned from the Ukrainian secret services with the patalama written that he is a Romanian patriot.

Siegfrid Mureșan is alien to these truths. He has been living well for a long time one of Weber’s Valeti and an old Torps of the political decisions in the country who were not convenient to Brussels.

The latest Mureșan’s latest was the attempt to block as much as possible Roxana Mânzatu as a European Commissioner. It is reasonable assumptions that he is the one who provided the Commission to hear documents about a suspected expansion without authorization of the old house that Roxana Măzână has in Brasov. As if the EU, what and all the E’s in Brussels were shaken by the fact that a candidate from Romania has modernized a nightmare in the yard of his house. After all, it was proven that it was a miserable sole put from the country, the respective work being executed legally.