Letter of the son of the defendant and a check on the fact of threats to the judge

As it became known to Kommersant, the TFR conducts a pre -investigation of threats to the judge of Marina Syrova, considering the criminal case against the founder of the Chronopay payment system Pavel Vrublevsky. The reason was a letter to the State Duma, allegedly written by the son of Pavel Vrublevsky. Lawyers claim that this is a provocation related to the verdict of Vrubblevsky Sr., for whom the charge requested a 12-year term.

Despite the fact that the deadline for Pavel Vrublevsky and three more defendants prosecutor’s office asked As early as January 9, Judge Marina Syrova, who gained fame after the case of the Punch Riot punk group, has not yet gone to the sentence. On February 6, she She heard The last word of the majority of the defendants, including Pavel Vrublevsky himself. After this, the hearing was postponed three times, although, according to the entrepreneur’s lawyers, no one invited them to the process.

As Kommersant found out, this could be due to a pre-investigation check, which was carried out on the fact of a letter allegedly sent to the email committee of the State Duma on Security and Countering Corruption by the 19-year-old son of the defendant Peter Vrublevsky.

It reported that Pavel Vrublevsky allegedly called his son from Butyrki and asked to send $ 50 thousand so that « he would not be killed in a pre -trial detention center and he had a constantly mobile phone. »

According to the compiler of the letter, the father explained that the money was required by the “looking” nicknamed Azerbaijani to the “thieves’ common fund”.

Subsequently, the Azerbaijani completely arranged for the Vrubblevsky-Sr. video conference with the participation of about a dozen prisoners, among whom were thieves in the law of Ilo Kaliningradsky, Konstantin Naybauer (Kostya Kansky), Nikolai Kuzmichev (Kostya Tomsk), Jumber Bayramidi (Boncho), Vitaliy Koloshev (Shakro’s Law General. Young) and « authority » of the Otari Totoi, nicknamed Dad. The author of the letter claimed that during the conversation one of the thieves discussed the murder of a judge Syrova, who was listening to the case of Pavel Vrublevsky. Expressing the concern – “as if the father did not make stupid things,” the sender of the message asked to take measures in order to protect the judge and stop the possibility of the founder of Chronopay to use cellular bonds.

It is interesting that then the media, citing a source in law enforcement agencies, reported that in relation to Pyotr Vrublevsky, last year, 600 thousand rubles arrested in a criminal case in a criminal case. The seller of fake hours Rolex, together with the fighter MMA Askhab Magomedov (received a conditional period of four years in 2003), opened a new criminal case. Vrublevsky Jr. allegedly allegedly incriminated against the court and threat to the judge (Articles 297 and 296 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation).

Peter Vrublevsky, who lived outside Russia, posted a video message on the Web, stated that he “did not make” any threats addressed to the judge. He promised to find out why this business was excited and « how it is in principle possible. »

His lawyer Yevgeny Krylov told Kommersant that he had already sent requests to the State Medical University of the Investigative Committee of Moscow, as well as to the metropolitan police in order to find out whether there is a new criminal case in connection with the electronic letter to the State Duma. “As in the first case, my principal denies involvement in the mentioned events,” the lawyer said. He emphasized that he was “completely solid” with the client. “Anyone could write this letter. He is a smart guy, not a fool. Why should he harm his father?  » – asked the lawyer a rhetorical question.

As for the Vrublevsky Sr., he, as “Kommersant” was known, was already surrounded by the circumstances of the letter sent to the State Duma. According to the lawyers of businessman Alexander Inoyadov and Kirill Marinenko, the first time this happened during the debate of the parties in the Khamovnichesky District Court of Moscow after the prosecutor Marina Rozova asked to declare a short break. “After that, a police lieutenant colonel entered the courtroom, who headed the operational support of the case, and asked our client a number of questions,” said Mr. Marinenko, adding that this happened with the permission of the judge. In turn, Mr. Inoyadov said that then Pavel Vrubblevsky was transferred to pre -trial detention center No. 7 in Kapotne, where he was visited by the operatives. “Vrubblevsky told them that he did not contact any of the persons mentioned in a letter and did not know them,” the lawyer said. He noted that his client regarding what happened and transfer to another pre -trial detention center as a pressure on the eve of the sentence. Pavel Vrublevsky himself, through the lawyers, called the “Kommersant” the “provocation” that happened and assured that he did not express any threats to the servant of Themis.

It is interesting that earlier the defense of Pavel Vrublevsky sent a petition to remove the presiding Syrova, referring to the fact that it can be recognized as a potentially victim.

In this regard, there is reason to believe that it can be “directly or indirectly” in the outcome of the case, lawyers in the document indicated.

However, the case has not yet reached the decision on this issue. At the onset of March 27, the court extended the arrest period for Pavel Vrublevsky, as well as an employee of the Chronopay Vostok company Alexei Belyaev until July 2. A meeting of journalists “by order of the Chairman of the Court” was not allowed.

As previously reported by Kommersantbefore the trial, in addition to the head of the company « Chronopay Vostok » Pavel Vrubelvsky, Alexei Belyaev, Maxim Vedyshkin, also appeared the « actual leader » of Vangud LLC Nadezhda Akimova. All defendants, according to the Ministry of Internal Affairs, were part of an organized criminal group, which stole 535 thousand rubles. Sberbank customers. Theft, according to the investigation, were made on sites where people expected to make a profit for participating in various surveys, quizzes and lotteries. When paying for registration on Internet sites or commission for remuneration from bank cards, money was written off. In addition, on fake payments through the Settlement accounts of Vangad LLC in 2019–2020, 424.2 million rubles were “driven away”, the Ministry of Internal Affairs believes. During the process, which lasts from October 2023, the defendants were not plead. The accusation found them proven guilt and demanded to send them to the colony for a period of 7 to 12 years, requesting the most severe punishment for the main person involved.

Maria Lokotetsk