Legal Assistant: The family disappeared because the children were intended to be separated
Lost family|According to the legal assistant, the family’s situation with child protection became inflamed after the home search.
The abstract is made by artificial intelligence and checked by man.
Robert Slotte, a legal assistant in a large family lost in Ostrobothnia, says that the family has disappeared because the children were intended to be dispersed in different units.
The family’s situation with the child welfare authorities had become inflamed after the home search and custody processes in early 2024.
Slotte criticizes child protection and says that the disappearance of the family is the result of child protection failure.
In Ostrobothnia the legal assistant of the missing large family Robert slotte says the family disappeared because they had heard that the children in custody would be disposed of in different units across Finland.
« When it became known that the family would be separated, they decided to take the hats. »
Police made a home search for a small house rented by the family in early 2024. Shortly thereafter, children’s care processes also began.
« They decided to leave when it came to knowing that children would be separated and injected in different places, » Slotte repeated the events of spring 2024.
At that time, the situation was already severely inflamed with the child welfare authorities, says Slotte. However, according to him, the family was offered support from local people.
« There was a big group behind them. They had bought a detached house from Munsala, which the family could have rented very cheaply and could have lived in it, » he says.
« It had also been discussed with child protection that child welfare could go to monitor living. »
The final inflammation of the situation was also influenced by the fact that when the children were then taken care, the right of the parents’ access rights was restricted.
Finally, in May, the family took the children from the investment facility and disappeared.
Slotte says you don’t know where the family is now. He hasn’t talked to parents for a long time.
“They’re not any alcoholics or criminals.”
Slotte thinks that parents wanted the children to school because they did not want to teach them everything that is taught in elementary school.
« Their home teaching they provided has been good and the children have done well. »
Slotte says that the children were no longer receiving school health care when they were not at school. That’s why the children visited a private doctor.
Family documents concerning the right of the family are an unspecified mention that parents are suspected of assault and imprisonment. Slotte says that violence is not about.
« If you do not give the child the care required by the authority, then I guess it can be interpreted that one fills the character of assault. »
Ostrobothnia Police say parents are suspected of arbitrary care. It does not comment on other pre -investigations where parents may be involved.
« It’s certain that they won’t go to any interrogation, » says Slotte.
Slotte is raining criticism for child protection for the family. He now considers children, especially children.
« This shows a complete failure of child protection in this case. The function of child protection is to unite families, not to distinguish. »
« Here, the machinery has rolled out an ordinary person. »
