« Kurti can’t settle all appetites »: which is why the Assembly of Kosovo has not yet been constituted? – Politics
After four consecutive interruptions and disposal of the constitutive session of the Assembly of Kosovo, the end of this crisis is not visible. As our interlocutors emphasize, the situation further complicates the fact that prizes in the Government are expected to support the Assembly, but that self-determination cannot meet the requirements of all.
The session of the Assembly of Kosovo was last broken after the Prophet Self-determination Glauk Konjufca asked the presidency additional time for dismissing the current situation, ie the impossibility of appointment of the President of the Assembly.
A candidate of self-determination, which was at the choice won the largest number of votes, is Masculined Hadžia.
During her voting for her appointment, on two occasions, she did not receive a more harmful votes – in the first she received 57 votes for, 20 against and 3 restrained, while in the other there was only one Prophet less against.
Although the beginning of the session, there was any speech on the possible support of the self-determination by certain opposition deputies, for now, was absent. After the failure to vote to Hadžia, the leader of the opposition alternative for Kosovo’s future (ABK), Ramush Haradinaj said that ABK could vote for the candidate of self-determination if they are MPs of Squads or Saranda Bogujevci.
Still, Bogujevci wrote on Facebook that ABK has no right to propose anyone, and reminded that this movement called her an amateur who was not worthy to lead the session.
After four days, the constitutive session of Kosovo Assemblies not completed. Each session has been completed by the interruption of the session, and the continuation is scheduled for Wednesday 23. April.
Speaking of legal procedure, Political policy Ognjen Gogić says that the answer to the question can be delayed by the session – does not exist.
« No legal or conditional deadline that defines until the President of the Assembly, it is a legal gap, » our interlocutor also adds that similar situations happened earlier, and that the Constitutional Court had the same word.
Gogic reminds that in 2020. year, after procrastination of Ashbin Curta, the Constitutional Court said that the right to propose the President of the Assembly must be used proactively.
« They would say it is not in a democratic spirit, that it is not the meaning of constitutions and then likely to probolk, since Kurti did not use that right, that this can be sent by the opposition », explains the interlocutor of Danas.
According to the constitutional Court, the President or People’s Members could be addressed, and they can do this in two cases, if the delay of session continues and if the candidate of self-determination does not receive enough votes for the third time.
Gogic adds that the right of proposing the President of the Assembly has the winner in the elections, but that it is not his absolute right, but that he is « only on the move », and that if he fails, that right to opposition deputies, while Constitutional court He could judge how many times the winner could propose a candidate.
Speaking about the political aspect of the training situation, Gogić emphasizes that the election of the Parliament’s president is related to the election of the new government, and that those who support candidates for the Parliament are negotiating with self-determination in « in the package ».
« Nobody seems to be able to support parliament if there is no promise to be with the government. He is working on it, he tries to Nisma and individual MPs of Alaban opposition parties to win, but it has failed to now. They trade with him, but he can’t settle all those appetites, « our interlocutor explains.
Given that negotiations on the Government take place in parallel, Gogić points out that the procedural process, politically speaking, is much more significant.
The Executive Director of the Epic Institute of Demush Šaša for today says that the legal framework envisages that the Assembly must meet every 48 hours until the election of the Assembly President.
« The legal framework does not provide for the final deadline until the President of the Assembly shall be selected, but the consequences of Kosovo will not have new elections and the will of citizens, » says our interlocutor and is currently visible to select the President of the Assembly.
Commenting on the allegations that appeared in public, that new elections are considered as a possible solution, the chais says it is not realistically expected.
« Current blockade of you more from the angle of immediate political negotiations between potential coalition partners and tactical moves to gain different parties as much of the institutional pie cake », concludes the interlocutor of Danas.
Gogic on the other hand claims that the election is one way to solve the current crisis, but that the question of whether another failed election attempt for the presidency was enough for that.
« The opposition still has a mandate to propose the candidate, but there is a right to the presence, it is more political assessment than legal, in the sense that they can also be able to go to new elections, » says our interlocutor.
Gogic concludes that the lack of election of the President of the Assembly in the foreseeable future Kosovo is probably approximately approximately elections.
Follow us on our Facebook and Instagram page, but also on X account. Subscribe to PDF List release today.