Kartheiser: « Europeans block the peace process in Ukraine »
While other parties are talking about the immminent danger that is going on by Russia and how Europe has to upgrade massively in order to be defensive, the ADR seems to want to concentrate all of its political strength on the retirement debate. More than half of the 15-minute speech by party president Alexandra Schoos at the party congress in Clerf consisted of listing the demands of the ADR to the pension system individually in front of around 150 party supporters.
Internally, the party has dealt intensively on the topic. For the ADR, the pension topic belongs to your DNA, say isolated ADR politicians at the congress-it was central to cutting a good figure.
Trump to the security breakdown: « I was not involved »
However, Schoos says less about the war in Ukraine. Only, the ADR would « not deviate a millimeter » from its position. Say: « Protect human life, prevent an escalation and to maintain the Ukrainian territories as much as possible, » said Schoos.
Around 150 ADR supporters gathered for the ADR congress in Clerf. Photo: Alain Piron
Ukraine: Not a “war of aggression”, but a “deputy war”
This may be due to the fact that the ADR has come into the crossfire of criticism because of its Ukraine position in Brussels-and that within its own EU parliamentary group. Fernand Kartheiser, the first EU member of the History of the ADR in Brussels, noticed in the EU Parliament primarily for his attitude towards Russia.
Among other things, Kartheiser had repeatedly spoken out against sanctions against Russia and had given an interview with a sanctioned Russian newspaper in December last year.
Europe blocks the peace process in Ukraine.
Fernand Kartheiser
EU member of the ADR
The chairman of the parliamentary group, Nicola Procaccini, therefore did not even exclude Kartheiser’s exclusion from the EKR in early February in Strasbourg.
Kartheiser complained that Europe did not follow the American path in the Ukraine question. The United States would no longer speak of a « war of attack in Russia » under Trump, but of a « deputy war between the United States and Russia ». That would not want to do this in the Trump administration and continue to speak of a war of attack. Kartheiser considers the term to be « propaganda » and a language of the bid administration.
EU report allows Kartheisers Luxembourg-Plan-with hurdles
Even worse: « Europe blocks the peace process in Ukraine. » While the United States and Russia agreed on a ceasefire in the Black Sea this week, the Europeans have already announced that Putin’s conditions of Russian President Putin have not agreed. He asked for a relaxation of the sanctions against Russia.
Keup: ADR is « an enemy image » for Greens and Socialists
What the ADR have taken from the new US administration is the criticism of the US Vice President JD Vance to Europe. At the Munich Security Conference, he had warned against stamping certain opinions as « disinformation ».
Fred Keup criticizes Greens and socialists to brand the ADR as a « enemy image ». Photo: Alain Piron
The ADR MP Fred Keup criticized the other Chamber parties of Luxembourg, who are committed to regulating social media. Such parties are not about democracy, but about maintaining power « . They would only « protect their world view » by « censoring social media ».
Why Luxembourg needs a fire wall against the ADR
Keup is also bothered by how the ADR is shown by other political forces – and thus indirectly reacted to the criticism of the other parties in the ADR after their way of dealing with the cause.
The MP had liked a Facebook comment who called on « destroying » « LGBTQ ». The party leadership reacted with sanctions and a written warning against Weidig – but the party did not know which « measures » were taken against the MP.
If you don’t have a program, you just do something against the right.
Fred Keup
ADR MP
The other Chamber parties had found hard words for the ADR when the Like became known. « If it is about the other parties, there are 150 extremists here in this room – the worst of the worst! » Keup ironically launched at the congress. Because among other things, Greens and socialists have « no program, they simply do something against the right ».
From this Keup concludes that either the green and socialists would have « closely mats the ratchet » or with their criticism they would « desperate for an enemy image ».