Judge Hurtado insists on accusing the attorney general without evidence and ignoring the background | Spain

Judge Ángel Hurtado, Instructor of the open case in the Supreme Court against the State Attorney GeneralÁlvaro García Ortiz, by revelation of secrets he has rejected impute For the same crime to Pilar Sánchez Acera. This Madrid leader of the PSOE was the chief of Cabinet of Oscar López in Moncloa when he sent at eight o’clock in the morning of March 14, 2024 A document to Juan Lobato, then socialist leader in the community of Madridwith the confession of guilt of Alberto González AmadorPresident of President Isabel Díaz Ayuso, and charged with two fiscal crimes. Although the content of that document had already told him hours before several media, no one had published it at that time.

Judge Hurtado is clear that the document left the Attorney General’s Office to the Moncloa Palace, ”he expressed in other resolutions before and wrote it again on Monday – although he still does not have a solid evidence of that fact. The popular accusations, which defend in this case the complainant, the fraudist confessed Alberto González Amador, asked the judge to achieve That proof that it was the Attorney General who sent the secret mail to La Moncloa. But Hurtado considers that it is not necessary: ​​ »It is already recorded, at the indication level that we find ourselves, such circumstance, and access to others that abound in the same could prolong the time of instruction. » The judge plans to bring the attorney to trial without having a single proof of what he did with the supposed secret revealed, given that García Ortiz erased any trace of his communications before the instructor urgently ordered the entry and record in his office.

Sánchez Acera declared before the instructor that I had received that information from journalistsalthough he did not identify them. The Hurtado Judge does not believe it and although he could impute Sánchez Sidera for false testimony, he prefers to be done by the Court to which this case corresponds if he finally reaches trial.

The instructor ensures that Sánchez Acera may always be accepted to the “acquittal excuse of article 262 of the Criminal Code” (the article badly quotes, which is 462) where it is established that “penalty will not be applied to those who retract a false testimony in a trial, which must be done in a timely manner, and before the sentence is issued”.

To justify that it does not impute Pilar Sánchez Acera, the judge explains that the revelation of secrets cannot be attributed to Sánchez Acera for two reasons: when she disseminated the document was no longer secret – it was in the hands of some media that had informed of its content – and neither did it have the category of official forced to save due stealth.

The judge obviates again some history of the case that would leave the criminal case against the attorney general. Hurtado says: « The factual basis of the revelation of secrets would be in the sub -ptia filtration to the media of an email with confidential information, whose interested party did not want to spread, but that, having come to the knowledge of a third party, public official, transfers him to a certain means, with the aim of advertising, reaching a public dissemination that he should not have achieved. »

Carlos Neira, González Amador’s lawyer, decided to disseminate an email that the prosecutor in charge of the case had sent him, Julián Salto, where he informed him that he had filed a complaint against his client and, therefore, could file conversations about a future agreement of conformity. That mail, whose dissemination did not authorize the Jump prosecutor in any case, was filtered to the media for Miguel Ángel Rodríguez, chief of the president of President Isabel Díaz Ayuso, partner of the confessed fraud. Together with that information, as the journalist of The world, Medium that advanced the news, González Amador or its environment reported that the negotiation open with the Prosecutor’s Office was based on admitting the two crimes in exchange for paying a fine and reducing its prison penalty of at least two years only eight months.

Judge Hurtado avoids referring to these details in his car, where he insists that “Secret means what carefully has reserved and hidden, and, as such, it is possible in attention to the entity and/or relevance of the information that reveals ”. It does not seem, for the known and for the investigated in the case that Hurtado instructs, that “the affected”, Alberto González Amador, did not want his negotiations with the Prosecutor to avoid jail, because it was his environment who detailed them, as the journalist of The world To judge Hurtado. In addition to disseminating these negotiations, they launched a bulus to explain their failure: « On the orders of above, » wrote Miguel Ángel Rodríguez, the proposal was withdrawn.

The instructor does not quote anything about all this in his story against the State Attorney General, Álvaro García Ortiz, who after reading the news advanced by The world – « The Prosecutor’s Office offers Ayuso’s couple a pact to admit two tax crimes while prosecuting the case

Filtering a secret secret to disseminate a bully – what Miguel Ángel Rodríguez did and has been accredited by judicial investigation – has become a criminal case against the State Attorney General, Álvaro García Ortiz, who collected all the information available to restore the truth of the facts.