Jelicic: If the judge’s committee defended Gotovina, he would not have aged the day. It’s a law firm
Dynamo was supposed to have a player more against Osijek than 38 minutes after Jon Mersinaj knocked down Wilfried Kango as the last defense player in a promising goal for goal, said Expert Maxsport Damir Skomina In the Tportal Analysis show.
01:40
Dinamo – Osijek
All matches of the HNL Supersport HNL only look at MaxSport channel of Croatian Telecom.
Commentator Josko Jelicic Asked if he agreed with such a decision and what a judge’s commission could say in a report fired in his style and by the way he criticized the body managed by Frenchman Bertrand Layec:
– When I read their clarifications, the judicial commission should be renamed as a law firm. I am sorry that Gotovina was lying for seven years, if he had been defended by the Judicial Commission would not have taken the day! Let someone explain to me why it is not for Radosevic’s Radosevic penalty, and is Nestorovsky against Hajduk. Amazing – said the former Dinamo and Hajduk player.
01:35
NK Slaven Belupo VS HNK Hajduk Split 0: 1
Playing the hand of Elijah Nestorovsky in the victory of Hajduk near Slaven Belupo was punishable, the referee’s commission said, while Skomina did not agree with it because the main judge only awarded it to VAR’s suggestion. On the other hand, at the draws of Istria and Hajduk in February (1-1) in the final of the match, Josip Radosevic played with his hand in the penalty area, the Split team sought a penalty, but not awarded. Skomina and commission agreed with that decision.
You can look at Radosevic’s hand HERE.
