It is inadmissible what the prosecution did to the Constitutional Court

Absolutely It is inadmissible what the prosecutor's office did to the Constitutional Court. Not that there are no grounds for criticism of the Constitutional Court itself for the fog that is wrapped and nothing is said.

The letter from the prosecutor's office to the Constitutional Court we saw yesterday leaves you breathless. How will the prosecutor's office ask the question of who are the constitutional judges who deal with this case and who are the experts? This is public information. It is a very little effort for the one who is interested.

The letter may be written because of a lack of knowledge and intelligence, but it may be because of malice. And this maliciousness to the institutions and the decision can be read in the reluctance to give a solution, which may be disadvantageous to someone. But the work of the court is like that. Including the Constitutional Court.

The decision of the Constitutional Court should be awaited because the Constitutional Court is outside the judiciary and outside the legislative and enforcement. Practically the only way in which a constitutional judge can be liable is before the Constitutional Court with a very complex procedure with a qualified majority. The Constitutional Court itself, when it was created more than 30 years ago, is thought of as an organ that cannot be influenced.

Unfortunately, our prosecutor's office has started to attack such organs several times. Rosen Plevneliev was the first president whom the prosecutor's office went to investigate, which is inadmissible. The prosecutor's office then stormed the presidency with the current President. The Constitutional Court is now firing. Often, when I talk about this organ, I say that this is the hat of the state. There is no one above it. How will constitutional judges investigate? It is unacceptable.

The Constitutional Court is not obliged to give the information to the prosecutor's office, but there is criticism for them, because this case has sunk such fog and darkness that you really begin to ask yourself what is going on.

Unfortunately, the latest changes to the Constitution, which was an attempt not to be a prosecutor's state, were not made in the best way in the parliament itself, but also the Constitutional Court itself, which was currently under pressure, has rejected them and declared them unconstitutional. The problem is serious and institutional.

And again I come back to the first question: What happens in the country? It breaks down. This is what we see. It does not function and this is the worst. It is time for everyone who is in one institution or another to do the job. I do not know if they will succeed, but this is the challenge for them.

It seems to me that There is no danger to the stability of managementS Regardless of the result we will receive as a decision of the Constitutional Court, even if it reduces the majority, it will remain so according to all calculations. In addition, the government has begun to receive support from the side. We saw that DPS New Beginning by Delyan Peevski supported the budget, which means that it is part of the government. Who votes for the budget is managing. This is a rule from several centuries ago because the budget is the state's policy. Who supports the budget manages. Who does not support is opposition. I see no grounds for fears and the euro area, because this support is more than a parliamentary majority. « We continue the change-democratic Bulgaria » support entry into the euro area, they themselves have stated.

We must also press those in parliament to fix the law and fix people, to prepare people. We have been talking about a professional election administration for years. We can prepare people, they can be posted, there can be observers. All this is not so complicated to be done. It can be done, there is experience. This means that Indeed, election rules need to be changed in a way that guarantees honesty.